This guy must listen to RAtM and be like “I don’t get it, work forces, burn crosses, this metaphor doesn’t make sense!”
This guy must listen to RAtM and be like “I don’t get it, work forces, burn crosses, this metaphor doesn’t make sense!”
They might not have 50 words, but he isn’t cheating.
Only if your prescription is for euthanasia!
This solution always made sense to me:
Another solution is to place tolerance in the context of social contract theory: to wit, tolerance should not be considered a virtue or moral principle, but rather an unspoken agreement within society to tolerate one another’s differences as long as no harm to others arises from same. In this formulation, one being intolerant is violating the contract, and therefore is no longer protected by it against the rest of society.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance?wprov=sfla1


Prison is where they should have sent their opponents instead of a second strike. They deserve death.


Glad to see this is still around.
Anybody where I can find an eighth of that third guy?


Oh man, to test this, just go somewhere and defend women. You’ll be destroyed.
Ugh I hate this attitude. People that say “words are just words” have never had a slur yelled inches from their face.
If words are just words, then what is hate speech?
Different kind of body count.


Depends on what kind of radiation. Alpha radiation? You can hold the banana forever, but you better not eat it. Gamma radiation? Kinda fucked either way.


The idiots have the box!
Me, eating alone because no one will invite me to their holiday celebrations lest I cook another face hugger: “Ha, got 'em”


Well this is a bit of a paradox, as we all know clowns are hung


Love the arc of Wikipedia btw.
Wikipedia in 2001: “Don’t use that site for school, it’s not a good primary source.”
Wikipedia in 2025: “Please, we’re begging you, just $3 can keep the last bastion of truth on the Internet from falling to misinformation.”


“When do I start feeling like an adult?”
That’s the neat part! You don’t!


I guess I was a little to aggressive in my original comment. I meant to explain why minority only groups get less flack than majority only groups, not to suggest that men only groups shouldn’t exist.
Women only groups exist alongside the people who disapprove of them. I don’t see why men only groups can’t. As many have pointed out, however, men only groups DO exist. Someone linked to dull_mens_club as a Lemmy specific example, but more broadly, fraternities exist. Battered mens groups exist. I think some groups like nights of Columbus and the masons are or were men only. Men only schools and colleges exist, as do women only. Most veterans organizations are primarily men just by nature of who makes up the majority of most militaries.


You’re putting words in my mouth and confusing the difference between a demographic and an individual. AS A DEMOGRAPHIC, women are oppressed. AS A DEMOGRAPHIC, men are not. We’re talking about statistics here, not individual experience.
The fact that some men are oppressed does not imply men are equally or more oppressed than women.
The fact that women AS A DEMOGRAPHIC are oppressed and men AS A DEMOGRAPHIC are not does not imply all men are oppressors. It DOES imply that men opress women, but like… fucking duh? If men aren’t pressing women, then who is? It doesn’t mean all men are oppressors, but are you seriously going to sit her and act like the majority of domestic abusers, sexual harassers, and discriminators AREN’T men???
You’re interpreting a defense of women exclusive spaces as an attack on individual men. You should unpack that.
Congratulations on the new cat 🐈 🎉