• mech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Electing a young pope is too risky.
    He doesn’t have a long track record and may still change his views, so he’s less predictable.
    And he could guide the church in a “wrong” direction for half a century.

    In the middle ages, popes were often elected at a younger age, but they were also less reluctant to “dispose of” a bad one, or excommunicate him for devil worship and elect a competing one.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Many of the people electing the pope have hopes of becoming pope one day themselves, so they elect someone they expect to outlive.

  • dragon-donkey3374@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    You should probably understand the priesthood is a career by election of mateship mainly. If you have a desire to rise through the ranks it’s basically about who you know vouching for you and it takes decades to get to the level you see at the Vatican where only a tiny minority ever make it.

    A person in their 30s and 40s is only beginning this career. It would be like taking a warehouse worker at Amazon and making them CEO.

  • LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Someone in their 30’s will significantly change their worldview over the next 50+ years.

    More than anything else, the church wants stability. If you elect someone in the last part of their life, you’ll have a much better idea of what ideology their entire papacy is going to be formed under.

    If electing a pope was only for 4, 10, or even 20 years, it would be more reasonable to elect a younger pope, but as it is a lifetime appointment, someone older is always going to be a more conservative option.

  • ℕ𝕖𝕞𝕠@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The Pope rules for life. If they elect a bad one and he’s seventy, oh well, won’t be long. If he’s thirty… that’s two generations growing up under a bad Pope.

  • zxqwas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Because he is elected for life so having long track record of things he has done is important to figure out if he is suitable for he job.

    And if he turns out to be a bad pope he will see himself or soon enough. Pun intended.

  • xxce2AAb@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Because they wouldn’t have the required time to manipulate everybody into hating everybody else just a little bit more than them.

  • Devolution@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Grey hair = too old to fuck children.

    At least that’s their belief system not their reality.

  • DaMummy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    You know how there’s a saying about banks,(I’m paraphrasing) “If you’re in debt $100k, the bank owns you. But if you’re in debt $1m, you own the bank”? Same way in church. If it’s one boy, or 100 boys.