As I’m slowly evolving my own flavour of spec driven development, I’m starting to think about the generated code as a secondary artefact where main quality criteria is that it’s doing what it needs to and it’s covered with tests.

I guess my current analogy is that I don’t care about how readable or dry is the assembly code generated by compiler.

I have the specifications and the working code with tests. I can always regenerate it if I need to.

But. I still read the produced code, steer the design and correct the obvious blunders. No vibes.