• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Well that would be a much bigger line to cross. Its reasonable to say under 16s are to young to navigate the world of online info. But its completely different to say no age can go on the internet.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      no age can go on the internet.

      I don’t think anyone had ever suggested anything like that.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You’re right. I have no idea how I read your initial comment and jump to that conclusion. I must have been tired when i replied.

        For the actual response. I think this law does partial combat the misinformation,advertising and brainwashing concerns. I dont think we can/need to prevent misinformation, advertising or brainwashing for people over 16 without serious infringement on civil liberties.

        For algorithm’s its far less feasible to go after. These companies protect the algorithm because its the core IP of their business. Its not something we can simply get rid of without destroying the most popular feature of the platform.

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The fact is, right now we know that Facebook has at times made a deliberate, conscious choice to leave in aspects of their algorithm that were causing harm. Their own studies have shown this. Making that practice illegal—knowingly causing harm with your algorithm—would be a good place to start with regulation.