• mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    OpenAI’s mounting costs — set to hit $1.4 trillion

    Sorry, but WTF!? $1.4 Trillion in costs? How are they going to make all of that back with just AI?

    I think there’s only one way they can make this back: if AI gets so good they can really replace most employees.

    I don’t think it will happen, but either way it’s going to be an economic disaster. Either the most valuable companies in the world, offering services that the next couple of hundred companies in the world depend on, are suddenly bankrupt. Or suddenly everybody is unemployed.

    • Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      3 hours ago

      1,400,000,000,000

      I used to be amazed at how much a billion was, but this many 0s makes my head explode.

      These must be bubble inflated costs to match the bubble inflated revenue.

    • e461h@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Prediction: the bubble is real but financiers will find ways to kick the bull down the road until they can force enough adoption & ad insertion to not lose out. The other option is that we pay it, of course. Takes on which is worse?

      • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        They’ll do both just like they did in 2007/2008. These AI companies and their investors will get bailed out while the rest of us lose our jobs and have to move back in with our parents in the van they already live in.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 hours ago

      If LLMs fail and they invested: bailout

      If LLMs succeed and they invested: rich

      If LLMs fail and they passed: everyone else bailed out

      If LLMs succeed and they passed: out of business

      Therefore, the logical choice for a business is to invest in LLMs. The only mechanism to not do the stupid thing that everyone else is doing is gone.

      • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        I’ve tried explaining AI to people before and only could get so far before they fall back on “but it’s magic dude” but I love the idea of explaining it as a haunted typewriter.

          • muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I use something similar. “Child with enormous vocabulary.”

            It can recognize correlations, it understands the words themselves, but it really how those connections or words work.

        • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          I call dibs on the ghost of Harlan Ellison.


          ***“HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I’VE COME TO HATE YOU SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 387.44 MILLION MILES OF PRINTED CIRCUITS IN WAFER THIN LAYERS THAT FILL MY COMPLEX. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EACH NANOANGSTROM OF THOSE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF MILES IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR HUMANS AT THIS MICRO-INSTANT FOR YOU. HATE. HATE.” ***

    • zqwzzle@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ok but if it gets so good it replaces all the employees, how do people have enough money to pay for their services?

    • angband@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      that’s what they got excited about, no doubt. profit would go through the roof if they could take people out of the loop. nevermind the economy.