• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 小时前

    your changing the definition of open source software.

    https://techwireasia.com/2025/07/china-open-source-ai-models-global-rankings/

    The tide has turned. With the December 2024 launch of DeepSeek’s free-for-all V3 large language model (LLM) and the January 2025 release of DeepSeek’s R1 (the AI reasoning model that rivals the capabilities of OpenAI’s O1), the open-source movement started by Chinese firms has sent shockwaves through Silicon Valley and Wall Street.

    And:

    DeepSeek, adopting an open-source approach was an effective strategy for catching up, as it allowed them to use contributions from a broader community of developers.”

    I’ve read similar descriptions in other articles, seems your claim is false.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 小时前

        The (claimed) source:
        https://github.com/deepseek-ai

        Investigating further I can see it is NOT open source. All the articles saying that are lying, probably unknowingly just as I believed the claim, they probably did too, and I’m NOT being sarcastic!
        I have no idea why publishing these “weights” is considered open source, it has nothing to do with Open Source as defined by OSI, which I believe has a historical right to the term.

        I apologize.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 小时前

            Oh I didn’t detect any snarkiness, just you being to the point, which is a thing I appreciate.
            But I’m often considered impolite. I think it’s a culture thing.

            But I must admit I am annoyed by you contradicting me, but it’s even worse that you were right.
            I find that generally offensive.
            So I’ll go sulk in corner for a few minutes. 😜 😋 🤣