cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/40372957

fyi:

  • https://github.com/yt-dlp/yt-dlp lets you download videos (from youtube and also hundreds of other sites)
  • for desktop, https://mpv.io/ is free and lets you watch youtube (or any other video) at even more and faster speeds than youtube premium does, among many other features
  • for android, https://newpipe.net/ lets you play youtube in the background (and download videos, and block ads, …)
  • https://ublockorigin.com/ blocks ads everywhere (and yes it does still work on youtube, at least in firefox anyway)
  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    12 days ago

    How is that any different from shifting existing features to premium? If you aren’t paying you’re lucky to get anything.

    I dont pay and I ad block everything. I’m surprised I can use the site at all. These features are nice to haves and not core to using YouTube.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      Lucky to get anything? YouTube couldnt even have grown at all if it was a paid product from the start. People made it into the success it is, by using it, because it was free.

      Now when its a monopoly, they do a bait and switch.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        So because they started off offering something for free they owe us? Its still free, there has been no bait and switch.

        • bthest@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          edit-2
          12 days ago

          Yeah. They owe us, they owe their content creators, they owe the tax payers who built and power the platform upon which their platform sits. They sure ain’t paying their fair share.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 days ago

            Some artists making content are practically their own little PBS stations or something, I’m with ya!

            Would it be more palatable if they told us using adblock w/o premium was “robbing creators of one-hundredth of a cent each time” or something? If I’m not mistaken there is a connection between content creator payouts and that.

    • bthest@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      I dont pay and I ad block everything. I’m surprised I can use the site at all.

      3 billion active viewers is what makes up the majority of Alphabet’s stock value. The revenue from ads, donation extortion, and premium are peanuts. That’s why youtube will never go full paywall or hard ban ad blocker users.

    • atopi@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      12 days ago

      As far as i know, there is a difference in psychology between taking away features and adding the new features already behind a paywall

    • schmups@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      12 days ago

      With you on this. Freeloaders have so many options to use the same service