A German man has been found guilty of drugging and raping his unconscious wife for years and sharing video of his crimes on the internet, in a case that has drawn comparisons to the trial of Dominique Pelicot in France.

Fernando P., a 61-year-old school janitor, was found guilty of abusing his wife inside the couple’s home, filming it and then sharing it online without the victim’s knowledge.

He was sentenced Friday to 8 years and 6 months in prison following a trial at a court in Aachen, western Germany. An appeal may be filed against the judgment within one week, the court said.

  • jaschen306@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Did the man know that all he needed to do to have sex with his wife is to do some dishes and occasionally take her out to nice dinner and listen to her bitch about the Karen at her work?

    Drugging your spouse to have sex with her seems like punching your own dick to cum. It might work, but there are easier ways.

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    ·
    1 day ago

    Note, Germany’s current chancellor voted against the law making rape in marriage illegal.

  • krooklochurm@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I was talking to a girl once on hinge that told me she wanted me to drug her until she was unconscious and fuck her.

    We never met. I’m good, thanks. Like. Even if someone wants that I’ve no interest.

    I don’t know wtf has to be wrong with you to want to do that to someone that wants to do it, let alone someone that doesn’t.

    They should throw this guy in the used syringe hole.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a fair argument for a longer sentence for such a horrible crime, but for Germany this is pretty long, prison sentences are not as inflated there as in the USA.

      • mcv@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 day ago

        It is pretty long by European standards. At the same time, it does feel unjust when the culprit gets a shorter sentence than he gave his victim.

        • Sculptor9157@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Does Germany have a sex offender registry? If so, the social sentence may continue well after release. While not quite the same, hopefully she can begin healing and move on with her life while his torment just begins.

        • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          My understanding of how most of Europe handles incarceration is that: instead of giving really long sentences, but allowing parole after x years like in the US, they give shorter sentences, and then they do a (yearly maybe?) review when the sentence is up to determine if the inmate has been rehabilitated enough to re-enter society.

          So a 5 year sentence in Europe can end up being longer in practice if they determine the person isn’t fit to leave.

          • mcv@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            I think that’s only in cases of insanity. Those can turn into life long treatment/sentences. For normal sentences, if you’ve done your time, you’re free. And you can get parole at 2/3 of that for good behaviour.

            At least in Netherland; obviously this can vary wildly per country. But in NL, the max sentence is 29 years, so even the worst murderer can get out after 13. Unless he’s declared insane.

            • Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              11 hours ago

              This is actually not correct. In NL we have true life sentences, even without insanity. After 25 years you are potentially eligible for a royal pardon. Then you still get a psych evaluation etc. The only one who could get you out is a royal pardon by the king. Not that it happens a lot.

  • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Wow, and I hadn’t heard about it until now. You’d think another Pelicot would be big news.

    Do they have laws against publicising these things before conviction, maybe?

    • Björn@swg-empire.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yes. Even after conviction they may only name the culprit in exceptional cases. It’s mostly for the victim’s benefit, but even criminals have a right to privacy.

  • AmidFuror@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Please don’t confuse this as victim blaming. It is not. I am curious about what the victim thought was going on with her health when she was being frequently sedated. Did she think she became a hard sleeper? Did she have side effects that she might have even seen a doctor for, who spent futile time testing for natural causes?

    Is this something that might one day be in the back of mind for nurses and doctors that someone is being secretly drugged, like Munchausen by Proxy?

    • anguo@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Gisèle Pelicot (a parallel case in France) was very public with her story, I imagine you can look for answers there.

    • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 day ago

      The french lady said she was dizzy and prone to fainting if I remember correctly. She went to see a doctor couple of times but they didn’t find anything.

      • AmidFuror@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        That’s exactly what I was curious about. There’d be no reason to do toxicology for someone coming in with these sorts of symptoms. Foul play is often the last thing people suspect.

    • I don’t know about this specific case, but what I do know is that often in cases of abuse there is a certain amount of Gaslighting involved. And even if there is no Gaslighting, the absurdity and horror of it all can lead to victims not wanting to believe what is going on.