After the controversial news shared earlier this week by Mozilla’s new CEO that Firefox will evolve into “a modern AI browser,” the company now revealed it is working on an AI kill switch for the open-source web browser.

On Tuesday, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo was named the new CEO of Mozilla Corporation, the company behind the beloved Firefox web browser used by almost all GNU/Linux distributions as the default browser.

In his message as new CEO, Anthony Enzor-DeMeo stated that Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software while remaining the company’s anchor, and that Firefox will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

What was not made clear is that Firefox will also ship with an AI kill switch that will let users completely disable all the AI features that are included in Firefox. Mozilla shared this important update earlier today to make it clear to everyone that Firefox will still be a trusted web browser.

  • Jhex@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    clearly some damage control strategy here… but good news if true

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        not quite like this… the original form was not a total kill switch, it was a vague “you are in control” (of this thing you didn’t ask for but we are activating for you by default)

    • Grabthar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      13 hours ago

      The news of being able to use or disable all of the AI features was in the original announcement as well, but it was pretty clear that most of Lemmy just read the headline and leaned into it.

      • Jhex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        not quite like this… the original form was not a total kill switch, it was a vague “you are in control” (of this thing you didn’t ask for but we are activating for you by default)

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Firefox just can’t win with their users.

      • Mozilla makes decisions based on market data
        • Users complain they never wanted those features
      • Mozilla makes a decision based on user feedback
        • Users shit on them for backpedaling or damage control

      It’s absurd.

      • fluxx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        No, it’s not. 1. Nobody wanted AI as a feature. 2. They didn’t even completely backpedal, that would be not implementing AI. This sounds like it will be opt out maybe. They may remove it if they feel like it.

        • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Not implementing any AI is stupid.

          I for one appreciate having offline, private language translation. Sending it to a Google Translate server is a privacy nightmare.

          My sister appreciates the better screen-reader functionality.

          Plenty of people do want AI features.

          • Ledivin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Hahahahahaha, he thinks none of this data will be sold 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣 it’s literally the only reason to spend all this money developing it

          • fluxx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Translation is already a part of Firefox and I don’t see too many have complained about this. It is also completely offline, AFAIK. What people are afraid, myself included is agentic AI capable of autonomous web browsing. That is a privacy and security nightmare, as is already demonstrated by openai’s browser, which was exploited the first day it was launched. Beyond translation, I personally am not interested in any other AI features. In fact, I don’t use the translation feature more than a few times a year.

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        In my books that comment was far from complaining about damage control.
        Just a objective observation.

        OP said that they are happy if true.

      • deathbird@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        What have they decided based on market data?

        I think in this particular case at least Mozilla decided to introduce something that their users didn’t want without asking, and our backpedaling and are being mocked for having done the thing in the first place.

        Frankly I don’t know what’s going on in their collective brains. What Firefox needs more than anything else is refinement. There are no features that it’s missing as far as I can think of.