• HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Hey that’s a fair point. Funny how often good ideas are kneecapped by crap executions.

    • NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m pretty sure the phrase “kneecapped by crap executions” is in the USB working groups’s charter. It’s like one of their core guiding principles.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        If anyone disagrees with this, the original USB spec was for a reversible connector and the only reason we didn’t get to have that the whole time was because they wanted to increase profit margins.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          USB has always been reversible. In fact you have to reverse it at least 3 times before it’ll FUCKING PLUG IN.

        • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          That’s the reason Apple released the Lightning connector. They pushed for several features for USB around 2010, including a reversible connector, but the USB-IF refused. Apple wanted USB-C, but couldn’t wait for the USB-IF to come to an agreement so they could replace the dated 20-pin connector.