- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
Boiling lobsters while they are alive and conscious will be banned as part of a government strategy to improve animal welfare in England.
Government ministers say that “live boiling is not an acceptable killing method” for crustaceans and alternative guidance will be published.
The practice is already illegal in Switzerland, Norway and New Zealand. Animal welfare charities say that stunning lobsters with an electric gun or chilling them in cold air or ice before boiling them is more humane.
It was never stated or implied that boiling water is unnatural. You’re putting a notion in that was never there. Feel free to quote me where I said boiling water is unnatural.
A self righteous asshole with better reading comprehension than you have apparently.
So anyways, boiling a living creature —> alive <---- is not a ‘natural’ thing in human nature.
There is some interesting evidence which suggests early humans and related species may have used naturally occurring hot springs to boil food, so it’s not exactly out of the question. It’s not DEFINITIVE by any means, but interesting.
https://www.sci.news/othersciences/anthropology/olduvai-gorge-hot-springs-08858.html
I’m not arguing that humans use boiling water to cook things. My argument is, and stands, that it not natural to take something living, and boil it alive.
That is interesting research though, thanks for the link.
Using boiling water to cook food is also natural.
Pardon me going a little off topic, but I can’t get over how bad this sentence is.
Work on your writing next.
Is ‘natural’ in single quotes because you’re using your own personal definition of ‘natural’?
Looking at every other carnivore on the planet, I’d say that empathizing with our food is less ‘natural’ than killing it painfully.
That response was everything I needed to read to understand exactly how smooth your brain is. Good luck