• Taldan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Got a source for that incredible claim?

    If you’re going to make wild claims that most people would disagree with, you better be able to back it up with objective facts

      • sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I just searched for chrome vs firefox and just about every article from the past year or so say firefox is more secure. Not that it matters a lot either way. Two party system is crap.

        • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          15 hours ago

          How so? at least on Android and Linux there is a lack of sandboxing and site isolation. This could be fixed up to a certain point but anyways it would be more insecure than chromium.

            • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              edit-2
              11 hours ago

              Do you have a more recent article describing that? 2022 is old but I’ve not seen anything backing up your claim either

              To the dumbass downvoters: why does lemmy hate the concept of backing up claims so much? There are two conflicting claims, one that says Linux sandbox is bad, another saying its fine. I’ll believe the first person who can actually back their shit up. Nobody should believe either claim until then. This isn’t complicated.

              • The_Decryptor@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago

                So there’s a couple of sources, like the (rather outdated) Mozilla wiki page detailing the sandbox support on Linux.

                And I know it’s specifically the Chromium sandbox, since they vendor their copy of it.

                I also just checked the sandboxing status directly in Firefox.

                And I’m kinda of cheating, I knew they used it since I’ve got an unsupported configuration with HW video decoding. It’s caused by their sandbox blocking certain things, and it’s a known issue. Nvidia drivers don’t support VA-API, Firefox only supports VA-API. There’s an adapter library available, but it doesn’t work in Firefox unless you disable the sandbox.

                Edit: Oh yeah, Firefox is also affected by the same issue Chrome is, where Flatpak interferes in the sandbox.

                • pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  3 hours ago

                  So, there is still the problem with the sandbox and the only way you have hw acceleration is to disable the sandbox, I bet it is elfarto VA API adapter library. And what about FF Android?

              • Steve Dice@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Because you’re an adult who’s expected to know how to use a search engine. I used DDG and it took me about 40 seconds to find the source for the claim you’re asking a source for.

                • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  56 minutes ago

                  Burden of proof is on the claimant. That should always be the expectation, not “Do YoUr OwN ReSeArCh”