• funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I prefer the opposite: The 'Pataphysical calendar

    • every day has a name, as well as a number
    • the last day of the month exists on the calendar but doesn’t happen in reality (with some exceptions)
    • every month has a Friday 13th
      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 hours ago

        it emerged out of the surrealist movement via Alfred Jarry.

        For reference his play “Ubu Roi” (Ubu the King) starts with the word “merdre” (often translated at “pshit” or “shitski”) - which after it was uttered in the first performance, caused a 15 minute riot in the theatre.

        The purpose, such as it is, is that you can make it “unimaginary” for a leap year etc, or if you need an extra day in a month for whatever reason - and it doesn’t alter the rest of the year.

        • wischi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I still don’t see the benefits. It’s a bit like saying that every Februar (in the Gregorian calendar) had 29 days but sometimes it’s imaginary and sometimes it’s not.

          Would you phone calendar show “imaginary days”? Could you schedule meetings on imaginary days? If yes - that would probably be a complete mess, and if not - why even call it “imaginary day” if it’s not a day at all.

          Seems a bit like a bandaid that tries to make it more symmetric/pretty. We could expand all months to 32 days in the Gregorian calender and just call some of the days imaginary. That way all months would be the exact same length 🤣