• essell@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    I think so, coz shrapnel is the stuff flying out randomly from the first “hit” 🤔

    • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      Would that mean a grenade rarely causes direct damage? The explosion is really only designed to throw shrapnel

      • essell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        I guess that comes down to frame of reference…

        You don’t have to hit a guy with the grenade itself, the indirect shrapnel will do the work.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Yeah, just a thought experiment, because we do consider shrapnel ancillary in the case of a bullet…

          I’m not sure if a grenade is a direct or indirect hit

          Rockets are similar where we call it a “direct hit” but realistically it’s just blowing up a large enough area that the target happened to be in the vicinity…

          • essell@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            Can definitely pick this apart, reminds me of examining forces in secondary school during physics exams.

            My thinking on the original point is that shrapnel is never aimed, even if deliberate, as you say it’s just there, it comes alongside the attacking action.

            Then again, in the sense that shrapnel typically goes directly from one place to another, it’s pretty direct

    • nyctre@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Sure, but even tho it’s random, it’s still a direct shrapnel hit as opposed to a grazing hit, I think.