• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      2 days ago

      I haven’t heard of a school shooting in a long time. I can’t tell if that’s because they stopped happening, or if it’s because they happen so often that it’s not even considered newsworthy anymore.

      • IvyisAngy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        49
        ·
        2 days ago

        … yeah it’s the second one. The US does not go a week without one really, you’ll find reports of them on local channels along with the traffic reports, weather forecast and car accidents. It rarely makes national news.

        I want off the ride. To be sure.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        They absolutely aren’t as widely reported; but not because of desensitization, it’s for the same reason suicides aren’t reported. Theres been studies showing it’s “contagious” and that reducing coverage helps suppress further occurences.

        • Doubleohdonut@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 days ago

          Then the action of reporting less should be combined with actively dissuading gun owners from mass shootings. So it has a noticeable impact and doesn’t just feel like people sticking their heads in the sand. It’s a human enough response, but USA has hard coded into their legislation and that can’t ever be challenged, apparently.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            Okay? Don’t think I disagree, but that’s also not relevant to explaining the specific reason it’s being reported less.

    • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s only quietly annoying because we legalized gun silencers this year!

      (Technically suppressors, and they’ve technically been legal for a while, but they were previously heavily regulated and hard to get the right to manufacture, distribute, or sell, and now it’s much easier, and no longer taxed at the federal level).

      • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only thing that’s changed is the $200 stamp tax was removed from the process. Everything else including registration and the background check remains the same. Wait times had only really come down from ~a year to a month or less for most cases because the ATF finally got their systems in a decent state for form 4 eFile.

        The last one I bought early last year took about a week for the form to be approved. The first one I ever bought a decade ago took nearly a year.

        • exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I wanted to avoid overexplaining the joke, but it’s also worth pointing out that the slight shifts in federal law this year is only a part of a broader push around state laws and American gun culture more broadly (and I’d expect them to keep lobbying for more federal deregulation after this year too), to where it’s now more economically viable to manufacture, distribute, and sell suppressors. According to this source’s analysis of ATF stats, we went from less than a million lawfully registered suppressors in 2016 to 1.5 million in 2018 to 2.6 million on 2021 to 4.9 million in 2024.

          There’s a broader shift underway, and I was just making a joke about it.

          • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            Gotcha, yeah, I could see the change bringing forward more suppressors on the market that are built with cheaper materials and meant to be more like wear items than something meant to last for years as the market had been for the US because of the regulations.

            I’ve only heard from hunters/target sport shooters in other countries where suppressors are less regulated because gun ownership was more restrictive; that they have a lot more access to cheap suppressors then we do.