No no, don’t you see, the act of the killing is how they identify people as guilty. It’s like wave function collapse in quantum physics — or “Schrödinger’s criminal” to put a pithy spin on it. Because the police only kill bad people who deserve to die, then anyone who is alive could be good or bad, but we don’t know for certain until the police kill them. If the police accidentally shot at a non-criminal, then they’d be fine — the non criminal body has ways of shutting that whole thing down
(I really should have to say this, but the internet is dark and full of bootlickers, so /s)
It’s an efficient process though. Once you’re identified as guilty, you can be removed as an obstacle.
Oh yeah. Now you only have to change the interpretation of guilty.
if you weren’t guilty, why would you be dead, huh? checkmate, libtard! /s
Eh, you get removed first, being identified as guilty can come later.
No no, don’t you see, the act of the killing is how they identify people as guilty. It’s like wave function collapse in quantum physics — or “Schrödinger’s criminal” to put a pithy spin on it. Because the police only kill bad people who deserve to die, then anyone who is alive could be good or bad, but we don’t know for certain until the police kill them. If the police accidentally shot at a non-criminal, then they’d be fine — the non criminal body has ways of shutting that whole thing down
(I really should have to say this, but the internet is dark and full of bootlickers, so /s)
If only we had a process that would be due for all people… Oh well, just let the cops decide I guess because they’ve never fucked up. Smart.
Then where would the
profitable incarceration enterpriseprison get its slave labor?