Do you want them to successfully prosecute him, or do you want them to make a big show and then not have enough documented evidence with full chain of custody and have their prosecution fail? Your indict first and investigate later idea will only serve to let him off.
It’s been 36 hours. Take a breath and let them work. They’re going to get there and they’re going to do it the right way.
Do you want them to successfully prosecute him, or do you want them to make a big show and then not have enough documented evidence with full chain of custody and have their prosecution fail? Your indict first and investigate later idea will only serve to let him off.
It’s been 36 hours. Take a breath and let them work. They’re going to get there and they’re going to do it the right way.
The guy murdered someone, he didn’t break into a Subway and steal the register and a cold cut trio.
deleted by creator
You don’t select the jury before the arrest…
deleted by creator
You’re right. You didn’t imply it. You said it.
“… First, start with a jury that confirms that none of them have seen the footage and made a decision yet…”
Part of your comment begs to differ.