I’ve been one of the people saying “we don’t need more users. we need quality over quantity” and i was wrong.

the way it’s going, lemmy needs active users who post content sothat the network stays relevant. networks like the fediverse benefit from network effects and that means that if we have more users, that improves the value and quality of the fediverse overall.

So please, everyone, when you can, make advertisement for the fediverse in your personal area. Go talk to friends, make attractive stickers and put them everywhere, stuff like that. We would all benefit from it.

edit: source for the graph

  • PagPag@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 小时前

    This place has always been dead if special interest groups are a measure. There is nothing here and honestly never was…

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 小时前

      I’m not disagreeing with you. I didn’t say “this place used to be a utopia of special interest content”.

    • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      12 小时前

      There’s plenty but. It’s only dead if you think you need to be constantly engaged by your phone all day

      • PagPag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        12 小时前

        This is empirically false. Given the context, it is more akin to grocery shopping at a gas station in the middle of nowhere.

        • Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          11 小时前

          No you’re wrong, using large words though really helps get your incorrect point across. Much further and you would be strawmanning it

          • Potatar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 小时前

            Which word is big there? empiric? akin? or is it grocery? gas? station? middle? Did they edit it out and I missed it?

              • Potatar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                9 小时前

                I really though you were gonna choose akin because I don’t hear that one as often as 10 years ago (and I never used it I think).

                I’m a non-native speaker and I use empiric and empirically at least once a week. STEM though, maybe I’m biased.

                • PagPag@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 小时前

                  Yeah, if someone I’m speaking to believes I’m trying to “use big words” for the sake of sounding smart, I generally just stop engaging with that person…

                  That exchange was some Facebook level shit lol.

              • Potatar@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 小时前

                I checked the usage statistics and you are partially (85%?) right. Empirically is rarer unless you are(/were recently) in academia, then it is very common. Akin is rare in general but only in usage, everyone apparently knows it.