• TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It pains me to say it, this century is indeed China’s century. Unless World War 3 happens if Thucydides’ trap is indeed the law of nature/ jungle.

  • giraffes@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Unfortunately, depending on the jetstream, we still get a lot of their pollution blowing over here to Korea. I think it is mostly from coal power plants on the coast. Anecdotally, the effect of EVs on the air there does feel like it has lessened the amount of smog that blows over to Korea, in the spring especially. Glad to hear they are making progress. Last time I was in Beijing the air was unbearably smoky (2011).

    • mirshafie@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Unfortunately despite leading on EVs, renewables and nuclear power deployment, China is also expanding coal. So their greenhouse gas emissions are still rising.

      • FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        I was under the impression that they reached peak CO2 emissions and have been flat or falling for the past year or so

  • scarabic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    13 hours ago

    It’s great news regardless but I don’t know why they feel the need to over-attribute this to EVs. It’s not like the majority of the population in Beijing ever drove cars. Regulations on heavy industry are briefly glossed over 10 paragraphs down so they can go back to glowing about EVs. But my impression after visiting Beijing was that a lot of the smog came from people relying on coal cakes for everyday cooking and heating.

  • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    19 hours ago

    No mention of the Subway expansion during that time?

    I had trouble finding numbers, so please correct me if I’m wrong, but the subway went from around 200km to 900km and from a handful of lines to 30 lines since 2008.

      • ZombieCyborgFromOuterSpace@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah but EVs means we can use the same profit making capitalist system. Trains and subways don’t turn as much profit. And it’s a socialist mode of transportation. /s

      • sik0fewl@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Ya, the article mentions shutting down factories and coal plants, etc., but it didn’t say anything about the massive subway expansion, which must be getting a lot of cars off of the road.

  • observantTrapezium@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “Thanks to EV” → annoying oversimplification. As even this biased article states “The change has been a result of government policy focusing on smog reductions, including restrictions on heavy industry”. One should also add expansion of public transit services to the mix of factors.

  • coherent_domain@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    They also moved shitload of industry outside of Beijing around 2008, so the pollution moves to more rural cities.

    EV and transport in Beijing is great, impressive, and I enjoy them greatly when I was there, but it is also important to set realistic expectations. Switching to EV and transport improves people’s lives a lot and probably can be a golden bullets in many western cities. But for a city as dense and big as Beijing, there needs to be other sacrifices.

  • mr_might44@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    19 hours ago

    It’s always nice to see some good news in the shitshow that is modern day life, makes me hopeful that a better future is still possible. I hope that one day Beijing (and the rest of the world) can go back to clean air 365 days a year.

    • themurphy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      19 hours ago

      China is basically what the western world was in the 60-70’s where progress were all over the place.

      Still behind in terms of alot of things, especially workers rights, but it’s not going backwards like it is in the US.

      • mr_might44@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Like all countries, there’s some good and bad things to say, but I think that investing in renewables was a very smart move on their part.

        • themurphy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          They still did it for all other reasons than being eco friendly.

          They simply just have the minerals and mines for solar and batteries. And the big one is offering the world an alternative for oil, which takes a big chunk into US profits.

          We are just lucky that it also means cleaner air for everyone.

          • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            13 hours ago

            Those other reasons were important, but China has a history of investing in industrial resources way before they’re expected to be profitable, and often at greater scale than the market would dictate. 1980s China didn’t expect Rare Earth minerals to turn a profit, but they understood that cheap Gallium for example meant LCD manufacturers would be more competitive/productive.

            When China started investing in solar panels 15 years ago, the price per PV was 5x more than it is now.

          • Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            China is already the world’s factory, so why not become the world’s battery factory too.

            People seem to be interested in electric vehicles, so might as well. Once China is the number one EV manufacturer, battery manufacturer and solar panel manufacturer, it’s going to become as wealthy as Saudi Arabia and USA combined.

            Good luck keeping up with that pace if your country still run on coal.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Living conditions have improved for the majority but the current leader (13 years) has increased autocracy, further reduced freedoms, continued oppressing Uyghurs and Hong Kong and increased the threat on Taiwan.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          18 hours ago

          increased autocracy, further reduced freedoms

          How so? A Chinese friend I made outside China who straight up said certain previous leaders of China should be hanged generally liked Xi.

          continued oppressing Uyghurs

          No investigation, no right to speak. Why don’t you come to Xinjiang or Kazakhstan and talk to some Uhigurs? There’s literally no travel restrictions, anyone can come here.

          Hong Kong

          They were governed by a council elected by business interests and the British crown. Hong Kong is the freest its ever been under China.

          But I’ve only spent like 10 hours there, and haven’t run into any Hong Kongers outside of China so I don’t have a strong opinion on what they’re dealing with, all I know is what the US wants for them is not in their interest.

          • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            18 hours ago

            Just so I know if my time will be well used to redact an answer, what’s your affinity with lemmy.ml, hexbear and lemmygrad?

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              I left lemmy.ml when traveling in China because its blocked by the Great Firewall, so is hb, while lemmygrad users are generally correct, I don’t think their attitude towards anarchists is productive, and sometimes I see some really bad takes from them.

              If you’re going to respond, do me a favor and base your take somewhat in reality.

              If you can’t read chinese, have never been to China, and aren’t getting your takes from anyone who has and doesn’t have a material interest in peddling propaganda, you probably shouldn’t speak on the matter.

              Btw, I should be in Xinjiang tomorrow night, and theres an older uhigur living nearby here in Kazakhstan if you had any questions you wanted me to ask.

            • themurphy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              18 hours ago

              What is it with lemmy.ml that I have missed? I personally just chose it by pure randomness on a list when I created an account, but I have seen it come up more times now as something negative?

              I have no clue what hexbear and lemmygrad is.

              • Cowbee_Admirer@reddthat.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                6 hours ago

                .ml, lemmygrad and hexbear are three Lemmy instances known for hosting mostly users with socialist viewpoints, many of them appreciating Actually Existing Socialist states. Hexbear is mostly defederated because it has a strict policy of protection of its 50%ish trans userbase against transphobia, whereas .ml is mostly federated as a major instance.

                There are frictions between non-socialists in other instances and socialists in those three instances, because politics is a complicated topic that reasonably makes people passionate and emotional.

                • themurphy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  57 minutes ago

                  Thanks, that’s a good explanation. Had no clue the difference between instances was big as most is federated.

    • Victor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Let’s hope the heavier EVs don’t rip up too much toxic road particles in the process.

  • hzl@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    Interesting. I’m not sure “clearer than ever” is a good descriptor for one of the regions with the worst air quality in the world. It gets much worse in the summer. It’s certainly better at the moment than some other cities in China.

    image

    image

  • Aatube@kbin.melroy.orgM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    great thing that PM2.5’s been vanquished. don’t the visibility issues mostly come from inner-mongolian winds of the north, though?

  • Victor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    18
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Wondering if the air will actually be better for humans though. There’s a lot more particles being ripped from the roads with these heavier EVs, and road particles are quite toxic as far as I understand, so not great. But yeah, great to have clear skies.

    • Cowbee_Admirer@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Most EVs by number in Chinese cities are electric motorbikes and tricicles, much much lighter than an electric car

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Are electric motorbikes and tricycles heavier than their gasoline-powered equivalents?

    • mr_might44@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I’d imagine the amount of road particles ripped up is less than the amount of CO2, NOx, ozone and other pollutants and fine particles emitted by combustion engines, but I’m no expert. Only time will tell, but at least short-term the results seem positive.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Less maybe, but probably more toxic than carbon dioxide, which isn’t really dangerous per se.

        • mr_might44@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          19 hours ago

          There’s more than just CO2 coming from combustion engines though, like nitrogen and sulfur containing compounds, which can in turn cause secondary pollution. Cumulatively, I think those pollutants have a bigger effect on human health than the road particles. Also, these road particles still get ripped up by regular cars, even if it’s to a lesser extent. So overall I’m still convinced that EVs are a step in the right direction. We can’t know for sure until more studies are performed.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Only way to have truly humane roads is to have them made of pure diamond, I guess. Only the purest blood diamonds, of course! None of that lab grown shit.

    • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      The road particles are heavier, they aren’t really leaving traveling too far in the air. They’re mostly a problem when it rains and are a threat to water quality.

    • bstix@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      The majority of wear on roads by far comes from trucks and busses.

      Personal vehicles are almost negligible in comparison, regardless of what engine they’re using.

    • bufalo1973@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      MGS5 EV -> 1650 Kg

      MG ZS gasoline -> 1250

      Not that different. And you have to add another 50 - 80 L of gasoline¹ to make it even.

      ¹ the size of the tank is not shown in the specs.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        ⅓ increase or so. Pretty big difference IMO.

        My compact SUV Volvo EX40 has a 2,100+ kg curb weight.

        Imagine this though: all the cars in the world switch from gas to electric, and on average add 30% of weight to every vehicle (which does seem like the normal increase). Wouldn’t that equate to adding, like, “X number of 18-wheelers” to the roads, wear and tear wise? Or does it not work like that?

    • optissima@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Do we have documentation on how/what their roads are made of? Probably safe to assume it’s similar, but their rate of enviornmental developments makes me wonder if there isn’t work being done on this.