CubitOom@infosec.pub to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agoFascist paramilitary invaders start unconstitutionally raiding houses door-to-door in the USA. We no longer have rights in America. Welcome to the land of Tyranny. (Minneapolis, MN - 1/11/26)cdn.social.linux.pizzavideomessage-square101fedilinkarrow-up1581arrow-down15file-text
arrow-up1576arrow-down1videoFascist paramilitary invaders start unconstitutionally raiding houses door-to-door in the USA. We no longer have rights in America. Welcome to the land of Tyranny. (Minneapolis, MN - 1/11/26)cdn.social.linux.pizzaCubitOom@infosec.pub to THE POLICE PROBLEM@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-22 days agomessage-square101fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSkunkWorkz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up34·2 days agoRemember when a cop destroyed a innocent bystander’s home to find a fugitive. Owner sued the city, and judge sided with her. But the 5th circuit said nah fuck that. Also SCOTUS declined to review the case. https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/11/25/supreme-court-swat-teams-property-damage/76129567007/
minus-squareNannerBanner@literature.cafelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17·2 days ago judge sided with her Correction: a jury sided with her. We should always remember that 99% of the time the appellants have had to convince multiple people that they were due remuneration, not just one.
Remember when a cop destroyed a innocent bystander’s home to find a fugitive. Owner sued the city, and judge sided with her. But the 5th circuit said nah fuck that. Also SCOTUS declined to review the case. https://usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/11/25/supreme-court-swat-teams-property-damage/76129567007/
Correction: a jury sided with her. We should always remember that 99% of the time the appellants have had to convince multiple people that they were due remuneration, not just one.