ICE’s approval rating among Americans currently sits at negative 13 points, a recent poll revealed.

More Americans support abolishing the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency than at any point since it was established in 2003, new polling shows.

According to data examined by Civiqs, 42% support getting rid of the agency while 50% oppose doing so, a split of just 8 points. This represents a major shift from a year ago, at the start of Donald Trump’s second term, when only 24% of Americans supported abolishing ICE and 59% opposed the idea, a 35-point split.

The 27-point change over the past year comes as Trump uses the agency to terrorize immigrant communities and overrun U.S. cities in the name of his mass deportation campaign, often using tactics that are not only harmful but illegal.

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Except it’s really not.

    Anyone who thinks Renee Good would’ve been shot and killed under Biden or Harris administration are patently delusional and enabling Trumpian dogma.

    Anyone want to play a game of identifying how many ICE murders there were between all of Obama and Biden administrations versus Trump?

    Edit: Back, tankies! Back I say!

    Your friendly reminder that these two images are banned in their respective leaders’ nations, and that by viewing them from your location puts you at risk for prison time in your country, should you reside there!

    • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      The only place those images are banned are in the minds of liberals that believe the propaganda that they are banned in their respective countries

      • lennybird@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s incorrect. They are absolutely banned in their respective countries. Do you need sources on this?

        • EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You gonna provide Western sources for your claim, the same ones claiming they are illegal?

          • lennybird@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Your English is poor. You aren’t winning social points for this unconvincing apologist rhetoric. Or is this punishment already for an infraction? Perhaps mentioning Uyghurs, Tibetans, Hong Kong, or Taiwan sovereignty?

            I wonder if one expects unbiased sources from within a totalitarian regime like North Korea or China going, “Yep! We totally oppress!” haha. So what sources DO you trust? I’m curious!

              • lennybird@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                12 hours ago

                Implying all Western sources are illegitimate is called a Fallacy of Origin.

                I’m simply calling a spade a spade. (this may not translate well for your translator).

                Anyways, tagged :)