“It is a sign that people aren’t happy within the U.S. government, clearly. The shooting [of Good] was the last straw for many people," Dominick Skinner, ICE list founder, told The Beast.

Information included in the new leak includes around “1,800 on-the-ground agents and 150 supervisors. Early analysis by the organization suggests that around 80 per cent of the staff identified remain employed by DHS,” according to The Beast.

  • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    278
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Nice, let’s dox them all, names of their family members, kids schools, SS#.

    You know all the stuff THEY already have on us and are using it to kill us. No legal protections for criminals.

    It’s ok to Dox a Nazi.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I personally believe that the kids should be left out of whatever repercussions their parents bring on since they themselves didn’t get to choose their spawn point.

      But any significant others of these ICE thugs should 100% have divorced their asses and rescinded access to their kids. Maybe should have even gotten restraining orders.

      If not, they’re complicit too.

    • minticecream@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      147
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Shouldn’t law enforcement information be public anyway? I didn’t know there were secret police in America.

      • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        ICE isn’t law enforcement, they don’t have the legal rights to enforce laws.

        Being an illegal immigrant is also not a crime, is a civil offense. Their law given abilities stop there.

        Essentially everything they are doing right now is blatantly illegal. It’s no different than an armed milita in that sense.

      • Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        120
        ·
        20 hours ago

        I didn’t know there were secret police in America.

        The masks and complete refusal to identify themselves didn’t give that away?

      • cynar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Even as law enforcement, they have a level of rights to privacy, just like the rest of us. That is why badge numbers are used. They unambiguously identify them, without also spreading who their siblings are, and where their children go to school.

        The lack of ANY identifying features for ICE “agents” is VERY telling.

        • smh@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          30
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I’m a public (state) employee. My name, title, and salary are posted publicly. I don’t see why ICE agents shouldn’t enjoy that same level of transparency.

        • TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          They do not have a right to privacy while they are on duty.

          And there is no “right to privacy” in the USA for anyone.

          • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            17 hours ago

            On paper, there is a right to privacy in the US in places where a reasonable person would have an expectation to privacy, which is codified into law.

            The only place where everyone has an expectation to privacy (barring exigent circumstances) is bathrooms (porta-potties included), changing rooms, locker rooms, or anywhere else where people are expected to use the bathroom or change clothes.

            There is an expectation to privacy for individuals on their own private property. I can spy on you in my house, but you can’t spy on me in my house (peeping through someone’s windows is a crime but me having a hidden camera in my living room is not).

            However, when it comes to public officials conducting duties of their office, there is no expectation of privacy, even on their private property (though, due to the conflict of interest, this is unlikely to happen).

            The only place where no one has any expectation to privacy is public property (like a park, post office, library, city bus, etc.) and private property which is open to the public (most businesses, malls, etc.).

            In practice, you can’t fart or jerk off without a corporation knowing about it.

            • swab148@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              12 hours ago

              In practice, you can’t fart or jerk off without a corporation knowing about it.

              I make sure they know about it!

            • BeeegScaaawyCripple@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              On paper, there is a right to privacy in the US in places where a reasonable person would have an expectation to privacy, which is codified into law.

              i’m unfamiliar with this

      • OshagHennessey@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It is public. To get around that, they pay Flock (or some similar company) to spy on us instead, then use our tax dollars to buy our data from those companies, then deny FOIA requests for our own data under the reasoning that it’s their property since they bought it, and you can only FOIA records they collect, not property they purchase.

    • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      It would be a shame if they were swatted. That sort of thing can cause serious trauma.

    • MortUS@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That’s what they’re hoping, and some radical targets them so they can shift blame.

      • NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        As long as we don’t give them that opportunity then they won’t shift blame or spill blood egregiously, right? So let’s just never fight back and things will inevitably get better, right? They would never escalate without the left giving them reason to, right?

        Fuck off with this.

        • MortUS@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Yeah, remember when Luigi really changed the world? No? How about Tyler Robinson?

          Mass civil unrest is the only way.

          If they are able to spin ICE assassins, they just as well could be able to drum up more support than civil unrest can match. They’re already having a difficult time finding and retaining their coalition. We know they’re going to decry the midterms. It is a war of attrition right now, and doxing ICE is just bait.