"Our caucus members will oppose all funding for immigration enforcement in any appropriation bills until meaningful reforms are enacted to end militarized policing practices,” the caucus’s deputy chair, Ilhan Omar, who represents most of Minneapolis, told a press conference at the US Capitol.
“We cannot and we should not continue to fund agencies that operate with impunity, that escalate violence and that undermine the very freedoms this country claims to uphold.”
Pramila Jayapal, the top Democrat on the House judiciary subcommittee on immigration, said the caucus wanted provisions included in the homeland security appropriations bill that would prevent ICE agents from wearing masks, require warrants for them to make arrests and end the use of private detention facilities, which have been criticized for keeping detainees in squalid conditions.
“Because the abuses are so widespread and occur in so many different places, we have to address all of them,” Jayapal said.
The opposition from the progressives – who number about 100 members, all but one of whom are in the House – could complicate passage of the homeland security funding bill, which is still under negotiation between House and Senate appropriators. The legislation is one of 12 bills that Congress, which is controlled by the Republican party, must pass to fund the government, and is typically enacted with bipartisan support.
The top House Democrat, Hakeem Jeffries, echoed the progressives’ demands at a Monday press conference, saying: “Clearly, there are some commonsense measures that need to be put in place so that ICE can conduct itself in a manner that is at least consistent with every other law enforcement agency in the United States of America.”
On Tuesday evening, Democratic senators joined with hundreds of protesters outside the Washington DC headquarters of Customs and Border Protection, where they signaled support for using the homeland security appropriations bill to force changes at ICE.
“We must stop funding DHS and ICE thugs, and we must demand that ICE leave Minneapolis and other communities to prevent further escalation and tragic death,” Massachusetts’s Ed Markey told the crowd.
Chris Murphy of Connecticut was one of the first Democratic senators to back the strategy, and has described it as a way both to impose reforms on ICE and ensure that resources from other federal law enforcement agencies aren’t diverted to immigration enforcement.
"It is not too much to ask for the Congress to say this: if we are going to fund the Department of Homeland Security, we want to fund an agency that is simply complying with the law,” he told demonstrators.
Good’s death came after DHS agents fanned out across the Minneapolis area in an operation that was initially directed at its Somali community. Minnesota’s attorney general on Monday filed a federal lawsuit seeking to stop the operation, while Kristi Noem, the homeland security secretary, announced that hundreds more agents from ICE and other federal law enforcement agencies would be sent to the area.
Administration officials have defended the killing of Good, with Noem accusing her of “an act of domestic terrorism”.
The Democratic congresswoman Robin Kelly has announced she will file articles of impeachment against the homeland security secretary for “obstruction of justice, violation of public trust and self-dealing”.
Delia Ramirez, a member of the progressive caucus whose Chicago-area district was targeted by an ICE campaign last fall, said she supported impeaching Noem but argued for going further.
“We need to prosecute the criminals in masks. We need to cut and claw back ICE’s funding as natural consequences for DHS’s disregard for the rule of law and violations of our rights,” she said.
“We have to use every single tool, including the power of the purse, to end the campaign of terror.”



Also democrats:
2004: funds ice
2005: funds ice
2006: funds ice
2007: funds ice
2008: funds ice
2009: funds ice
2010: funds ice
2011: funds ice
2012: funds ice
2013: funds ice
2014: funds ice
2015: funds ice
2016: funds ice
2017: funds ice
2018: funds ice
2019: funds ice
2020: funds ice
2021: funds ice
2022: funds ice
2023: funds ice
2024: funds ice
The 2013 to 2015 era is especially heinous.
2013: Obama appoints Tom Homan (current border Czar) to run ICE.
2014: Homan goes on record saying that separating children from parents is an effective means to discourage illegal border crossings.
2015: Obama awards Homan a Presidential Rank Award??
It’s absolutely wild. Dems set all of this up, Trump exploits it so that capitalism can grow recklessly, Dems pretend to hem and haw about how horrible this is, they get back into power, they do nothing except continue funding ICE and the genocide.
Most democrats aren’t progressive.
Exactly my point. They are complicit in what’s happening now, if you’ve paid even just a little bit of attention.
Does ml require you to all be both sidesers or is it a naturally self selecting phenomenon?
I mean, if you believe the Dems will actually follow through with this, after 2 decades of record funding, no material changes to how ICE operates, record deportations under Dem leadership, and 75+ dems currently cheering on ICE … well, I have a bridge to sell you.
To address your attempted dig at me, it comes from actually reading books instead of consuming western propaganda media, which is owned and operated by the same billionaire oligarchs who are pulling the strings on your beloved Dems (and Reps).
Now, kindly get blocked. kthanxbai
Both sides? Motherfucker are you paying attention? They’re all on the same side. It’s us against them.