Archive link

Donald Trump on Monday, January 19 threatened 200% tariffs on French wine and champagne over France’s intentions to decline the US leader’s invitation to join his “board of peace.” The board was originally conceived to oversee the rebuilding of war-torn Gaza, but the charter does not appear to limit its role to the occupied Palestinian territory.

“I’ll put a 200% tariff on his wines and champagnes. And he’ll join. But he doesn’t have to join,” Trump said, referring to French President Emmanuel Macron. A source close to Macron told AFP on Monday that France “does not intend to answer favorably” to the invitation.

The board’s charter “goes beyond the sole framework of Gaza,” the source close to the French president said.

  • Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’m guessing that the people who buy actual Champagne in the US don’t notice the price and won’t notice the tariffs. Plus $100, $200, $1000 per bottle - whatever.

  • borQue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    It;s actually a good thing we can keep those fine wines for ourselves now. The Amercians have no taste whatsoever.

  • driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Didn’t the supre court said that those tariffs were ilegal and the government is going to reimburse like a trillion?

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      I don’t think so. I think some lower courts did, but the Supreme Court changed the rules to ban “blanket injunctions,” so every wronged party has to bring their case to the courts and considered on a case-by-case basis. I think there’s a case about tariffs that the Supreme Court is supposed to rule on but haven’t yet. The admin, right now, can seemingly do anything it wants by just tying up courts with large numbers of illegal acts. They face no consequences for doing so, and the Supreme Court is mostly complicit (and illegitimate).

  • dunestorm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Trump is having a speed-run on running the US into the ground as hard as possible. You clowns that voted this Nazi in 🤡👏

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    ·
    10 hours ago

    So when are we tariffing the shit out of US products?

    I’m sure every business in Europe suddenly having to pay 200% extra for Office 365 and mail handling will send them scrambling for a European alternative.

    And they won’t go back once they’ve moved.

    • m3t00🌎@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 hours ago

      been reading about several mandating open source in government offices. due to low quality, low security microsoft crap. give them more reasons.

    • MBech@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      I had a talk about this with my boss today. We’d be fairly fucked in my department without Autodesk products. Sure, we could probably get a different software that can do similar things, but the department would become incredibly inefficient very quickly. Our product quality would suffer immensely, and our manual labour hours in production would skyrocket.

    • hraegsvelmir@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      9 hours ago

      This gives us the possibility for one of the funniest ends to this, where Trump gets in a pissing match with Italy over something, tries to extort them with tariffs, and the Italian mob takes him out for trying to squeeze in on their territory.