• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    “Becoming her,” would be attacking her because of where she was born, or skin color, or religion, or sexuality. We should attack her intolerance.

    Parent comment wasn’t attacking her intolerance. Parent comment was wishing her harm.

    Furthermore: “Religion” should not be a protected class.

    They deserve the ICE treatment.

    As are you: You are wishing harm on her, not on her intolerance. This is the exact distinction I was trying to highlight.

    • itistime@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I want her to wake up. I have heard too many accounts like hers. Those accounts are depressing, because nearly 100% of them expressed that they would still support the politicians that harmed them.

      As far as religion, I’d prefer if it didn’t exist, but I will tolerate people’s delusions if they don’t cause intolerance and harm to others. It is not inherent like skin color, but it is does create classes that get targeted by intolerant classes.

      At some point, we must harm the intolerant by depriving them of liberty, or life. We have been entreating and begging for them to not be this way. Our “want” to hurt them is the culmination of our frustration and understanding of what their intolerance leads to. There is no fucking paradox here. That fury that we are feeling is the natural impulse to survive or die.