• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    My thought is that turning up in Boulder, Colorado and asking the first person you see if they like chocolate, vanilla, or strawberry ice cream then claiming everyone in the city likes vanilla is misrepresentative.

    You don’t ask the first person you see. You ask fifty or sixty people, get their demographic data, and then feed that into a big pot. Then you pull some of them back out again based on the statistical norms across the whole country.

    The principle being that you’re not trying to get the “average” person in Colorado. You’re trying to get the “average” person nationally, with a random sample of Colorado residents feeding that model.

    • JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I understand that. However I didn’t choose Boulder, Colorado to ask a national question - I specifically posed a question irrelevant to location because the question being asked is not important to what I was attempting to illustrate.

      I chose Boulder for its population size, which is proportionally the same as what the NYT has done. If the survey were completed by 50/100,000 of voters, the sample size would be 0.0005%, which in my opinion is much better than 0.00001%.

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        However I didn’t choose Boulder, Colorado to ask a national question

        It’s in the nation. I don’t see why you wouldn’t.

        I chose Boulder for its population size, which is proportionally the same as what the NYT has done.

        Pulling a sample is going to get you results consistent with the national average when the people you select are representative of the average