U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar said Thursday she is running for governor of Minnesota, promising to take on Donald Trump while unifying a state that has endured a series of challenges even before the federal government’s immigration crackdown.
Klobuchar’s decision gives Democrats a high-profile candidate and proven statewide winner as their party tries to hold onto the office occupied by Gov. Tim Walz.
Klobuchar cited Trump’s immigration crackdown in Minnesota, federal officers killing two Minnesotans who protested, the assassination of a state legislative leader and a school shooting that killed multiple children — all within the last year. She avoided direct mention of ongoing fraud investigations into the child care programs that Trump has made a political cudgel.
🤠🐍Crikey! Look at this beauty! What we’ve got here is a absolutely stunning specimen of a .ML comment in its natural habitat!
Now, you’ve gotta be real careful with these fellas - they’re absolutely fascinating to observe, but don’t you dare let ‘em get their hooks into ya! See, what they’ll do is they’ll present themselves as perfectly reasonable, right? But if you start believin’ what they’re sayin’, mate, they’ll latch onto your critical thinking and just absolutely devour it from the inside out!
This is one of the most dangerous thought parasites in the digital ecosystem, and she’s a beaut! Best observed from a safe distance with your skepticism intact. What a ripper! 📷
You gonna eat that?
Do you have any kind of real substantive things to say to me or is it just liberal pablum?
Like do you think I see criticisms from liberals who enjoying licking the boot on their neck and take it seriously?
I would love to engage in an actual conversation if you are capable.
actually i more or less agree with your analysis of walz and Klobuchar’s political leanings. I would support any true left candidate for sure. You were just kind of an angry dick in your comment, which is why I decided to take a shot in jest.
I think you are ascribing a character to what I said that is not there. Where was I angry or a dick in what I said? I’m just being honest.
You right that your written text specifically doesn’t call for that.
The dick part comes from the context and your word choice; the “meta” if you will. The users see the post title, then they see the comments, and they get this specific thread where the first comment was calling out shitty centrism.
Then your reply was critical and sarcastic: “its funny…” it’s not funny. You clearly don’t think it’s funny. You’re being sarcastic, which in this context is a hostile choice. If we were in a room together, everyone would feel the negative vibe.
further the fact that you were being critical of the poster who technically did write something that you agree with. But it wasn’t good enough for you. You chose to criticize it for not being good enough. You could have chosen to add to it in a friendly way. Dickish.
And the cherry on top is that ML has a really bad reputation. I have personally quit discussions with ml people because there’s no honest discussion, it’s just a jump to pushing niche agenda and anger and putting others down. You are wearing that domain on your name tag. It speaks to something about the choices you make and the people you like to associate with.
All of these things combined is why I think you’re getting downvoted to hell.
I don’t know you personally and the fact that you’re actually open to some discussion is quite valuable in my book. Personally, you’re coming off as much higher quality person than most ML people I’ve dealt with.
You asked, so I answered!