When a reporter asked Trump on Thursday evening whether or not he would be drawing back in Minneapolis, he responded: āWell, we want to keep our country safe. Weāll do whatever we can to keep our country safe.ā
āSo, not pulling back?ā the reporter asked.
āNo, no, not at all,ā the president said.
This stands in stark contrast to what his administration has said this week.
After federal agents killed ICU nurse Alex Pretti on Saturday, Senate Democrats had threatened a government shutdown over the inclusion of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding and, within it, a historic increase to Immigration and Customs Enforcementās (ICE) budget.
Seemingly in response, the Trump administration scrambled to claw back some of its messaging.
The White House reneged on top officialsā comments calling Pretti an āassassinā and āterrorist,ā and the administration booted Border Patrol official Gregory Bovino from his position overseeing the raid in Minneapolis. The new chief of Operation Metro Surge, āborder czarā Tom Homan, assured the media that the operation was going to ādraw down.ā Trump himself said on Tuesday that āweāre going to deescalate a little bitā in Minneapolis.
And, for good measure, Trump administration insiders leaked some stories to the media about turmoil within Trumpās cabinet about immigration policy.
Just hours after Trump and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-New York) announced that they had reached a deal to avert a shutdown, however, Trump changed his tune. That deal, which would give DHS two weeks of funding to operate while negotiations are ongoing, was announced Thursday afternoon.
Trumpās comments lend credence to critics who said that the administration was only posturing about deescalating while never planning to do so.
The Senate still hasnāt passed the funding package due to some Republican holdouts. However, other Republicans have framed the negotiations as a win ā and critics have slammed the deal as one that disproportionately benefits Trump.
The threat of a government shutdown was a major leverage point for Democrats. It would begin this weekend, just a week after federal agentsā killing of Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, giving Democrats power over Republicans to extract concessions on the Trump administrationās ICE operation.
Trump was desperate to avoid it ā especially after his party shouldered much of the blame for the historically long shutdown last year. In a post on Truth Social on Thursday evening, he lauded the package.
Meanwhile, critics have slammed Schumer for the deal, which only buys Republicans time to distance themselves from the Pretti killing and continue the administrationās raids in Minneapolis and other cities unhindered.
āLeader Schumer should ask the Minnesotans who are watching their neighbors get killed in cold blood if a deal with no plan to stop ICE is enough right now,ā said MoveOn Civic Action.


This argument persists because it is easier to believe that everything is rigged than to engage with the complexity of political institutions. It provides an emotionally satisfying shortcut, but it collapses under even a minimal amount of empirical scrutiny.
Dude. The heads of both parties are all over the Epstein files. They all hang out in the same social circles. Itās a big club, and youāre not in it.
The last two Democrat presidents arenāt on that list. And yet they sat on that intel and let the GOP take power. Bizarre.
I really do not agree with this statement. I think their actions speak for themselves and itās quite easy to see through that.
In the article, the minority party is described giving up a strong bargaining lever in exchange for vague promises with no guarantee of follow through. Again.
Controlled opposition. The rest of the world sees it. Why not Americans?