Just thought I’d note this. Main beneficiary so far seems to be piefed.ca.

    • Skavau@piefed.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      “Behave as I want”? What? I think it’s reasonable for a developer, any developer to not view those who, from their perspective, seek to denigrate their work, possibly in bad faith, across multiple places.

      You are talking to Skavau.

        • Skavau@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          No, I’m seeing hostility used from others across the wider fediverse. I don’t think anything he said there was really specifically hostile at all in any thread. A complete reach.

            • Skavau@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 hours ago

              Hostility by simply doing code reviews and questioning odd design choices?

              By spamming it everywhere every chance they can in an effort to try and drive people from Piefed, by making no effort to inquire or outreach to anyone in a neutral way as to why the code is as they (think) it is.

              But in comparison to the Lemmy admins. Sure. Do you think they take seriously, and view the opinions of those that are rude to them all across the fediverse?

              Or hostility like the lemmy devs face constantly?

              I mean he’s been accused of running a CIA-style op (or compared to).

              • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                9 hours ago

                Weird, I was told to only assume the positives in everything. Shouldn’t they be happy to have people looking and spreading the code?

                Now I see the issue its they didn’t do it in pr or only ask in approved spaces (even though most are on instances rimu has blocked). How could they not want to be neutral after having it start with him completely against them.

                I mean he’s been accused of running a CIA-style op (or compared to).

                I’m not sure what else they would expect when starting by explicitly banning leftists from the space they are currently in.

                • Skavau@piefed.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  Now I see the issue its they didn’t do it in pr or only ask in approved spaces (even though most are on instances rimu has blocked). How could they not want to be neutral after having it start with him completely against them.

                  You think that Rimu would jump onto these instances that lets say are mutually ideological hostile and take notes and believe they’re arguing in good faith?

                  I’m not sure what else they would expect when starting by explicitly banning leftists from the space they are currently in.

                  How has he done that outside of his control?

                  You think every single community that bans leftists (per your definition) is necessarily run or controlled by the CIA?

                  • goferking (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    9 hours ago

                    You think that Rimu would jump onto these instances that lets say are mutually ideological hostile and take notes and believe they’re arguing in good faith?

                    I’m saying they shouldn’t be surprised when no one wants to discuss things with someone who specifically said they don’t want anything to do with them. Which also goes back to the language rimu uses when questioned.

                    Again are you pr for piefed cause you are way to invested in defending it, doing best to distract from the actual points and issues brought up and seemly instantly responding.