• Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    guy is a pedofile and rapist

    So essentially a sex offender, lets not forget there is a word specifically for this purpose.

      • Virtvirt588@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        There are sex offenders who don’t touch kids

        I think you meant pedophiles, since its an attraction. Sex offenders are people who already offended; therefore, touched kids.

        I can agree with the last part, there is no excuse he can make to change the situation for him or others. Also he might be a nepophile, which really highlights the vile part.

        • Carrot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I don’t think you know the definition of sex offender, it doesn’t always mean someone’s done something to kids. You can be a sex offender and only attacked adults. Hell, you can be a sex offender without even touching another person. So “sex offender” isn’t enough here. A “pedophile sex offender works”, but even then it doesn’t show that he has done the worst sex crime that can make you a sex offender, so I’d say it’s still not enough. A “child rapist” is really the best way to ensure everyone knows exactly what he’s done.