• MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s not how a society built on laws work, and the judge would be abdicating his duty if he let him off light.

    Besides, he is MAGA, and I suspect that whole situation was set up as a PR boost for Trump. He’s the fall guy anyway.

    • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Laws aren’t black and white, they’re always open to interpretation and discretion. It’s why jury’s exist, it’s why lawyers exist, it’s why the courts exist, it’s why the police exist.

      If allowances aren’t made, it’s not a lawful society.

      You’re wanting to go back to Monarchy/dictatorship, which is where one person rules and makes the decisions.

      • FishFace@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        The law’s pretty clear in this case.

        What you’re saying is really that breaking the law was justified, something that the legal system has no concept of and never can.

        This has nothing to do with dictatorship; all democracies are built on the rule of law, which means the if you break the law (and are caught) you suffer the punishment.

        It’s actually the opposite: Discretionary exceptions to the law are a hallmark of authoritarian societies where those with power let their friends off the hook, but punish their enemies harshly. Maybe you can think of some examples in recent times in the US.