• A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Is that really phrased as a question?

    It’s been a truism for decades. Well, starting with more effective engines. The fabled 3-litre-car (if anyone remembers) could have been widespread reality since… idk the 90s I guess, but it never happened thanks to oil lobbies.

    edit: oops that was eurocentric I guess. “3-litre-car” means that it consumes 3 litres of fuel on 100km. And such cars did and do exist but were never developed & advertised as they would have deserved.

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 days ago

      I had a 1-liter, 3-cylinder car in the 90s. No fable, but people wanted bigger cars that cost more to operate.

      • A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        How much fuel did it consume on 100km?

        It’s true, such cars were not fabled, but rare and never advertised as they would have deserved. I once drove a 1980s Diesel Opel station wagon a few hundred kilometers to haul some stuff, mostly on the motorway, mostly very conservative driving, and it used 3 liters / 100km.