You’re kidding right? Republicans are trying to make it so anyone who changes their name, even married women, can’t vote. They’ve historically fought against black and poor people from voting for decades. Just the policies flying around now are nuts. I haven’t heard of armed Democrats hassling people in line to vote.
The Democratic leadership strategy falls apart with a challenge from the left. They’re able to keep leadership and candidates that are far to the right of what their base and voters are and want because, while they’re inept at attacking right, they make very sure to deal with any threat to their left as the existential threat to them it is. If there’s a block to their left that doesn’t subscribe to VBNMW, then they can’t continue that grift and pretend the left has nowhere else to go.
Man put it together. It’s relevant because I’m talking about a situation where citizens try to start voting reform, and saying that Republicans in charge would be much worse for trying to get that passed. They are clearly worse for that movement than the Democrats. Because they pulled some bullshit to get third parties off the ballot doesn’t mean they are some golden child who’s going to let ranked choice in, but that’s less bad than the stuff Republicans do. Figure it out
I’m not even sure if you understand how voting works. You obviously have the data but managed to figure out the most ineffective and incorrect way to solve the problems we both agree exist.
It’s obvious we’re not convincing each other of anything and no one else is reading this, I suggest we just part ways here.
You’re kidding right? Republicans are trying to make it so anyone who changes their name, even married women, can’t vote. They’ve historically fought against black and poor people from voting for decades. Just the policies flying around now are nuts. I haven’t heard of armed Democrats hassling people in line to vote.
Either way the strategy I put forward stands.
You’re conflating general voting rights with access to ballot lines and closed primaries.
These are very different things, and the Democratic Party (and GOP) have different goals with each of them.
The Democratic Party has led numerous lawsuits to remove 3rd party, especially Green, candidates from the ballot line. The greens even have a list here - https://www.gp.org/third_party_suppression_a_problem
The Democratic leadership strategy falls apart with a challenge from the left. They’re able to keep leadership and candidates that are far to the right of what their base and voters are and want because, while they’re inept at attacking right, they make very sure to deal with any threat to their left as the existential threat to them it is. If there’s a block to their left that doesn’t subscribe to VBNMW, then they can’t continue that grift and pretend the left has nowhere else to go.
Man put it together. It’s relevant because I’m talking about a situation where citizens try to start voting reform, and saying that Republicans in charge would be much worse for trying to get that passed. They are clearly worse for that movement than the Democrats. Because they pulled some bullshit to get third parties off the ballot doesn’t mean they are some golden child who’s going to let ranked choice in, but that’s less bad than the stuff Republicans do. Figure it out
Do you not understand how primaries work?
It really seems you don’t.
I’m not even sure if you understand how voting works. You obviously have the data but managed to figure out the most ineffective and incorrect way to solve the problems we both agree exist.
It’s obvious we’re not convincing each other of anything and no one else is reading this, I suggest we just part ways here.
Buddy, you’re the one advocating voting for people you claim to oppose. Think about that real hard