

I love this idea. Celebratory hate bottles. It’s perfect.


I love this idea. Celebratory hate bottles. It’s perfect.


It’s edgy because it’s missing the point. Ok yeah sure the news lies don’t trust the news blah blah, that’s ignoring that AI is not only regurgitating those lies but also even lying on top of that. “Uh the news lies anyway we should trust AI” is a dumb take.
I’d argue it’s going against the typical propaganda, which is saying that the poor, unemployed, drug using people at the bottom of the rung are miserable, stupid, hate their life and you should always fear that position in life. The solution presented is to work, for the benefit of a wealthy few. A comic that shows this station in life as desirable and good, that people living outside of the rat race can be happy, is subversive. It’s not saying “know your place and stay there”, it’s saying “you can still have beauty in your life even if you’re not wealthy”.
I see someone’s lived a privileged life and never lived in a poor neighborhood.
So, in wealthy neighborhoods, it’s not that people are cleaner and therefore somehow better than poor people. They actually have people to clean up the streets and yards for them. They also aren’t as crowded and don’t have as many shops near where they live. In poor neighborhoods, people can’t afford to hire people to clean up their yard and streets, there’s more people so there’s more of a chance someone is a jerk and litters, and there’s more shops so more people who don’t live there come in and also potentially litter. It’s an uphill battle to do it yourself all the time, so yeah, sometimes garbage drifts into your yard.
You ignored how clean and tidy the inside of their trailer is, where they have more control over their environment.
You’re exactly the kind of person who could learn a lesson from this comic but it goes right over your head.


This comment was like a pizza slicer, edgy but no point


I’ve seen on my feed just today about how ai lies about the news 45% of the time. It’s just not worth it.


Way to assume no one, at all, ever, tried to have a calm debate with people and changed minds. Sorry you weren’t paying enough attention.


I think that your attitude towards communication is based off of an assumption that academic centric linguistics are inherently intellectually superior and appropriate for all social situations, and that by having this view you view yourself as intellectually superior to others who do not subscribe to that manner of speaking at all times, and enjoy passing judgement on others as inferior to you because they use the word fuck.
This is a narrow view of linguistics, social dynamics, politics and debate.
The primary goal of that man was to get those ICE agents away from those Hispanic looking people and to leave. These agents are unlikely to have their mind changed with calm, reasonable debate. In fact, these types of people view that style of communication as weak, and would have not been intimidated or moved to leave.
So, in that regard, yes, that was a master class of communication, because he used his words, and only his words, to get two armed people to not kidnap people off of the streets and leave.
A calm, intellectual debate would not have worked.
I suggest that you consider how you attitude is, frankly, a little classist, and narrow in scope.


A screwdriver set with all the tiny weird heads that you almost never would use. I got one as a gift and it’s been really useful


Chat gpt? To educate yourself? No thanks I don’t want glue on my pizza.


Vulgarity, yelling and screaming actually were very useful in that situation and were perfect for the intended outcome, to be intimidating. I think that was the perfect choice for expressing how he felt and to get the result he wanted.


Fuck right off dude, these videos help people feel less afraid of ICE and it’s probably more than you’re doing anyway


If you think people should let you enjoy things in peace, you should let people not enjoy things in peace. And if you would shut the fuck up and read, maybe you’d find more games you could enjoy.


Ok true, but gold has been valuable since the BCE, even when survival was the main priority and a much bigger concern than it is for a large amount of people today. I think humans are gonna see gold as valuable even in the worst of circumstances.


More efficient for whom? And how? Because this is kind of hard to agree with when the efficient solution is a small amount of people with huge amounts of debt and everyone else not getting an education even if they want it.
I mean, what’s the point of public coffers if they aren’t being spent on public good?


Ok, I agree with you, I do, buuuuut
If someone shows up to an interview wearing pajamas, they are probably less likely to get a job. So you do have to dress up a little bit, depending on what the job is.


You’re not allowed to listen to music, watch movies, read books or look at pictures now. Because they are useless.


What in the never took art history trying to force a topic can’t read the room off topic ass shit are you drinking?
Insufferable