The last time a car was excluded due to failing to comply with the 107% rule was in 2012. They’ve already waived it tons of times since then, most recently for Sargent and De Vries (2023) and Stroll (2021).
I know it’s waived when you crash in qualifying, because you’ve usually demonstrated in practice that the car is fast enough. The original purpose was to keep out cars (not necessarily drivers) that didn’t have the pace, right?
Well, yes, but the original purpose came from a very different era in the 90s, where you had really poor pay drivers and also teams that pretty much were only interested in showing up to the race to be seen for sponsorship purposes and were never even intending to actually race. It was intended to keep unserious cars out, and I would be highly surprised if they barred Aston from racing in Australia even were they 5 seconds off the pace.
The last time a car was excluded due to failing to comply with the 107% rule was in 2012. They’ve already waived it tons of times since then, most recently for Sargent and De Vries (2023) and Stroll (2021).
I know it’s waived when you crash in qualifying, because you’ve usually demonstrated in practice that the car is fast enough. The original purpose was to keep out cars (not necessarily drivers) that didn’t have the pace, right?
Well, yes, but the original purpose came from a very different era in the 90s, where you had really poor pay drivers and also teams that pretty much were only interested in showing up to the race to be seen for sponsorship purposes and were never even intending to actually race. It was intended to keep unserious cars out, and I would be highly surprised if they barred Aston from racing in Australia even were they 5 seconds off the pace.
It’ll be interesting to find out! Personally I can’t imagine they’ll be that bad on race day, but stranger things have happened.
If there’s one thing we’ve learned, it’s to never underestimate the incompetence of this Aston team.