mesamune@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 天前Googling Is for Old People. That’s a Problem for Google.www.wsj.comexternal-linkmessage-square145fedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down131file-text
arrow-up1212arrow-down1external-linkGoogling Is for Old People. That’s a Problem for Google.www.wsj.commesamune@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-218 天前message-square145fedilinkfile-text
https://archive.today/?run=1&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Ftech%2Fgoogling-is-for-old-people-thats-a-problem-for-google-5188a6ed
minus-squaremesamune@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up29arrow-down1·19 天前Honestly it usually starts with chatgpt or ai. I’ve been watching my younger coworkers. It’s not a bad thing per-say but sometimes it’s wildly wrong and they don’t question where it comes from. Which bites them when we do reviews/code.
minus-squareBuffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28arrow-down4·edit-219 天前 per-say I think you mean per se. https://www.dictionary.com/e/per-say-or-per-se/
minus-squareLyre@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·19 天前“sometimes it’s wildly wrong and they don’t question where it comes from” A stark difference from google results surely
Honestly it usually starts with chatgpt or ai. I’ve been watching my younger coworkers.
It’s not a bad thing per-say but sometimes it’s wildly wrong and they don’t question where it comes from. Which bites them when we do reviews/code.
I think you mean per se.
https://www.dictionary.com/e/per-say-or-per-se/
“sometimes it’s wildly wrong and they don’t question where it comes from”
A stark difference from google results surely