BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoWoman jailed after using shooting suspect's catchphrase as insurance company denied claim.www.rawstory.comexternal-linkmessage-square300fedilinkarrow-up11.08Karrow-down110
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1external-linkWoman jailed after using shooting suspect's catchphrase as insurance company denied claim.www.rawstory.comBonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square300fedilink
minus-squareconartistpanda@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 year agoJust dont say what I dont wanna hear
minus-squaredoingthestuff@lemy.lollinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down6·1 year agoIt’s because she said they’re next, and it was recorded. Threats aren’t protected speech.
minus-squaretechnocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down2·1 year agoThe state threatens people all the time.
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up17arrow-down25·1 year agoWell, she actually said “Delay, Deny, Depose. You people are next,” That’s a pretty direct threat. The headline is misleading.
minus-squaremeliaesc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up41·edit-21 year agoThat’s worth 100k bond? Really? That’s more than voluntary manslaughter.
minus-squareQueen HawlSera@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up30arrow-down1·1 year agoThey’re afraid of the common man now
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoI don’t think so, no. Context is everything though. Before the assassination, just free speech, after, a threat of significant violence. Also, free Luigi!
minus-squaremeliaesc@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 year agoI suppose so, but the thought process of just jailing any verbal dissent… how long can, a healthcare system of all things, run on fear?
minus-squareɔiƚoxɘup@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoWell, it’s not just any dissent, it a threat of violence. If she didn’t say, “you’re next” I’d be agreeing with most of the people in this thread. Whoever posted this left that part out of the post. I wonder why.
minus-squareBronzebeard@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down2·1 year agoPointing out that what someone is doing puts a target on their back isn’t necessarily you threatening them.
minus-squareKbobabob@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down2·1 year agoWhere is the actual threat? You people are next, to get delayed, denied, or deposed.
deleted by creator
Just dont say what I dont wanna hear
It’s because she said they’re next, and it was recorded. Threats aren’t protected speech.
The state threatens people all the time.
Well, she actually said “Delay, Deny, Depose. You people are next,”
That’s a pretty direct threat. The headline is misleading.
That’s worth 100k bond? Really? That’s more than voluntary manslaughter.
They’re afraid of the common man now
They are supposed to be…
I know
I don’t think so, no. Context is everything though. Before the assassination, just free speech, after, a threat of significant violence.
Also, free Luigi!
I suppose so, but the thought process of just jailing any verbal dissent… how long can, a healthcare system of all things, run on fear?
Well, it’s not just any dissent, it a threat of violence. If she didn’t say, “you’re next” I’d be agreeing with most of the people in this thread.
Whoever posted this left that part out of the post. I wonder why.
Pointing out that what someone is doing puts a target on their back isn’t necessarily you threatening them.
Where is the actual threat? You people are next, to get delayed, denied, or deposed.