Susan Collins is going to win, and in a few months, people will be comparing her to Biden, McConnell, and Feinstein as her handlers walk her around DC and whisper in her ear how they want her to vote. Democrats will help Collins win by forcing in a corrupt conservative centrist that no one in Maine wants to vote for.
The centrists and Republicans, along with their billionaire donors, are almost certainly elated. This was never about SA or morality, because we can look all around Washington and see that no one gives a crap about any of that. It was about eliminating a vote against the billionaires and the Epstein Class.
Look I’m still on the side of believing her. I still think the allegations are have all the hall marks of being credible. But hallmarks aren’t direct evidence and nothing thusfar, I think, would stand in a criminal investigation.
But if there are texts, Graham will have the other side of the conversation of those texts. If the allegations are not true, Graham has some real footwork to do to identify and elevate that evidence asap. If it is true, I just can’t imagine a sane or rational person denying it as strongly as Graham did. But the denial tells me more is going on here and there is a requirement to do more than just accept conjecture (which the entirety of the DNC political apparatus has).
Still no proof.
Still only he said she said.
If there’s proof present it and arrest him.
Susan Collins is going to win, and in a few months, people will be comparing her to Biden, McConnell, and Feinstein as her handlers walk her around DC and whisper in her ear how they want her to vote. Democrats will help Collins win by forcing in a corrupt
conservativecentrist that no one in Maine wants to vote for.The centrists and Republicans, along with their billionaire donors, are almost certainly elated. This was never about SA or morality, because we can look all around Washington and see that no one gives a crap about any of that. It was about eliminating a vote against the billionaires and the Epstein Class.
Look I’m still on the side of believing her. I still think the allegations are have all the hall marks of being credible. But hallmarks aren’t direct evidence and nothing thusfar, I think, would stand in a criminal investigation.
But if there are texts, Graham will have the other side of the conversation of those texts. If the allegations are not true, Graham has some real footwork to do to identify and elevate that evidence asap. If it is true, I just can’t imagine a sane or rational person denying it as strongly as Graham did. But the denial tells me more is going on here and there is a requirement to do more than just accept conjecture (which the entirety of the DNC political apparatus has).