• warm@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    This is a good example of how powerful hardware is now and how games that run like shit don’t have much excuse other than horrible management.

    • drosophila@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      The engines themselves have gotten better at pushing pixels too.

      Remember all the hype about Euclideon “infinite detail” stuff back in the early 2010s? How they had a data structure that pre-sorted their voxel data in such a way that they could switch between rendering big and tiny voxels depending on the player’s point of view, seamlessly and in real time?

      We have that now, just with polygons instead of voxels, which actually makes it even more technically impressive since Nanite has to maintain the mesh’s coherence (though I guess in some ways Nanite is a bit worse, since there’s only so much it can reduce a mesh before it disappears, whereas you can just keep making voxels bigger and bigger).

      The foliage you see in that forest demo is Nanite geometry.

      • warm@kbin.earth
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        You are right, it’s all very impressive tech, but most UE5 games still suffer from TAA. Maybe at 4K+ it looks great, but at lower resolutions it’s like the screen is coated in a thin layer of Vaseline. The push for realistic graphics, left graphical fidelity behind.