• Zorque@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 days ago

    Just because someone says they represent everyone, and that what they own is owned by everyone, doesn’t make it true.

    Did people have a say in what they could do with that infrastructure, or was it ultimately just up to the people in charge? If the former, it was socialism, if the latter, it wasn’t.

    Be more concerned with what people do, not necessarily what they say, when ascribing ideals to them.

      • lad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        You sound like you know better because you were there with Lenin. That is besides the fact that in almost 80 years a lot changed in USSR and what maybe was true at first, was not so in the end

        • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          Or I’ve read books by scholars describing their systems and their evolution over time and it’s just not really worth arguing with a bunch of vaguely leftist dorks who think the fucking USSR wasn’t socialist because they were authoritarian.

          One of the two things.

          • Zorque@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 days ago

            Which books? I’d love to read more on this topic. Maybe I’ll get some actual insight outside of “No, you’re wrong because I know what’s right, you dork”