• treesquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I wonder who’s telling them the locations. By that I mean I wonder when Putin, Trump’s best friend now that Epstein is dead, told Iran where the cables are.

    • Seralth@piefed.seralth.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Frankly im absolutely fucking baffled no ones tried this before. It seems like such a no brainer way to cause actual damage and problems. I dislike that someone has finally thought about it tho.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    22 hours ago

    The unsettling part isn’t that tankers are lingering over cables. It’s that nobody can easily distinguish a ship having a very boring afternoon from one preparing to disconnect entire countries. Apparently the global Internet now depends on whether a tanker captain feels like dropping anchor.

    • ryannathans@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      I imagine there would be divers and explosive charges being placed for these types of operations, but anchors are still a very real risk

      • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        22 hours ago

        An anchor is a cheap way and gives everyone a wonderfully convenient excuse: »Oops, maritime accident.« The cable ends up broken either way, and proving intent becomes almost as difficult as repairing it.

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          22 hours ago

          An anchor has someone present to point fingers at. A charge detonation at a random time when nobody is around has only really got some accusations that can be denied