Summary

China has intensified its crackdown on erotic fiction writers, particularly those creating danmei (gay romance/erotica), with over 50 arrests in Anhui province since June 2024.

At least 10 individuals have been sentenced, with penalties reaching up to 4.5 years in prison. Many writers published on Taiwan-based Haitang Literature, which has faced disruption.

Under China’s strict laws, earning over 250,000 yuan (~$34,500) from such works can result in a life sentence, though reduced sentences are possible if profits are repaid.

Critics argue the campaign undermines freedom of expression and inflates sales figures to justify harsh punishments.

    • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Term limits being removed doesn’t mean they don’t hold elections every 5 years… The US didn’t even start out with term limits.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        They hold elections regularly in Russia too. Who do you think always gets re-elected every time?

        Also, who runs against you in a one-party state? Who would even dare run against Xi?

        • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          They hold elections regularly in Russia too. Who do you think always gets re-elected every time?

          These elections are known to be rigged and you can easily find evidence that they are. I’m asking for evidence like this about China. You seem very confident about this, so, you must have some easily sourced evidence, no?

          who runs against you in a one-party state?

          ??? everyone, because that’s how having one party works, everyone is part of the same party. One party doesn’t mean one candidate. It’s no different than if parties were abolished.

          Who would even dare run against Xi?

          Why would someone bother running against an extremely popular incumbent?

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            Why would someone bother running against an extremely popular incumbent?

            Oh, so you mean he’s president for life.

            • Communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 days ago

              Oh, so you mean he’s president for life.

              Yeah, in the same way that Franklin D. Roosevelt was, because of his popularity.

              I support term limits but this ain’t the argument you think it is.