• RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    25 days ago

    Personally I think of she did something to deal with the absurd amounts of eco problems caused by her concerts and general mass flights she wouldn’t really have any issues, at least that I’m aware of. As far as billionaires go, not bad.

    One hell of an environmental impact though.

    • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      25 days ago

      To play devils advocate, if she needs to go somewhere for a concert, it’s not like she can just go to a normal airport like the rest of us. It would turn into an absolute frenzy and everyone would miss their flights.

      • reptar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        24 days ago

        Nobody doesn’t get that. To me, the point is she’d have to have a slower, smaller tour and apparently she wouldn’t accept that.

        There’s no “needs to go somewhere”.

        • ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          24 days ago

          That doesn’t really solve the issue of literally millions of people wanting to see her perform. If she doesn’t go to them they will come to her, which obviously is not good for the environment either.

      • ReiRose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        24 days ago

        If a person takes two aircraft to a destination that’s excessive. That’s “fuck this planet and everyone on it, I’ve got mine and I’m fine” excessive