• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    You read all three of those links in four minutes?

    Also, irrigation creates food, which people need to survive, while AI creates nothing that people need to survive, so that’s a terrible comparison.

    • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m already familiarized on industrial and computer usage of water. As I said, very little impact.

      Not all food is needed to survive. Any vegan would probably give a better argument on this than me. But choice of food it’s important. And choosing one food over another it’s not a matter of survival but a matter of joy, a tertiary necessity.

      Not to sound as a boomer, but if this is such a big worry for you better action may be stop eating avocados in a place where avocados don’t naturally grow.

      As I said, I live in a pretty dry place, where water cuts because of scarcity are common. Our very few super computers have not an impact on it. And supercomputers on china certainly are 100% irrelevant to our water scarcity issue.

      • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t know why you keep bringing up luxuries like avocados. I don’t remember the last time I ate an avocado, or a banana, or any exotic fruit for that matter.

        I somehow feel like you won’t listen to LLM criticism from me either, so it’s a disingenuous argument.

        • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Because it’s the typical exotic fruit.

          If you really don’t eat anything that it’s not native to your land good for you, you are one in a million.

          What I mean is that the environment argument for being against AI doesn’t really hold. It’s just an excuse to justify the dogma.

          • faythofdragons@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            22 hours ago

            Except AI centers are much much more impactful than any single decision a single person can make. Demanding perfection before assessing legitimacy of a complaint is also an excuse to justify dogma.