• Ebber@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    So no aid to Ukraine and show Russia that it can indeed start wars where thousands die and destroy countries, without negative consequences?

    • Woozythebear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Where are the negative consequences for America? Why can America invade any country it wants and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children but for some reason when Russia does it we have to show them they aren’t allowed?

      Only America and its allies can start wars and commit genocides?

      • ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Classic whataboutism.

        Because the US does interventionism, fund far-right politicians, etc., Russia (and China) can do as such, and even more. At least the US doesn’t want to “regain it’s old lost territories”.

          • NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            In fairness it’s a solid criticism considering there’s two kinds of comparisons that aren’t made on equal footing. To argue U.S.'s kind of intervention is the same as the Russias, would be more appropriate to consider Russia’s pre 2014 involvement in Ukraine. If you want to compare full-scale military operations then ZILtoid makes a good point. We haven’t tried to annex another country in a long time.