President Volodymyr Zelensky left the White House early without signing a mineral deal with the United States following a heated exchange with President Donald Trump on Feb. 28.

Zelensky departed in his motorcade around 1:45 p.m. local time, without holding a joint news conference scheduled for later in the day, after the two leaders got into a heated argument while speaking with journalists in the Oval Office.

. . .

CNN reported that following the exchange, Zelensky and Trump left to separate rooms, with the Ukrainian delegation wanting to continue talks with the Trump administration.

Trump later ordered his officials to tell the Ukrainian officials to leave the White House, despite protest from the Ukrainian delegation.

MBFC
Archive

  • MyOpinion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I want to be clear this is the doing of Republicans in America they are evil.

    • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s gonna be interesting watching to see if all the “All Russian people are complicit because they don’t rise up and kick Putin out” crowd actually put their money where their mouths are and show them how it’s done, or if it was all bluster.

      To be clear, I hope it’s the former but I think it’s the latter.

      • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Unlike support for Trump in the US, support for genocidal imperialism among russians is at minimum a strong majority if not an overwhelming majority. The majority holds across all demographic segments; age, education, rural vs. urban, income.

        At the point is usually when you hear arguments such as “all russians are afraid, they are all secret liberals” or “how can we truly know what russians think”.

        It turns out that people that people who work in this areas do have methods of not only accounting for preference falsification, but even estimating it’s scope.

        And even adjusting for preference falsification you still have at least a strong majority openly supporting imperialism and genocide.

        Is this situation the same for support for Trump in the US?

        • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Is this situation the same for support for Trump in the US?

          I haven’t gone too in-depth into this, but a quick search show a 50/50 split in favorable vs unfavorable opinions of Trump. Last time I took a look, serious pollsters who found interesting ways of measuring support for Putin in Russia without endangering those participating found generally a 33/33/33 split between those in favor of Putin, those against, and those with no opinion (part of the intentional depoliticizing of the Russian population).

          So, I guess it’s vaguely accurate to say there’s more people that dislike Trump in the US compared to Putin in Russia, but also more people that like him.

          • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            21 hours ago

            50% favourable (not net) is still a lot, but nowhere near as bad as in Russia were support for the annexation of Crimea was at 85% between 2014 and 2021 with no real preference falsification.

            Do you a source on the 33/33/33 split in Russia? Genuinely curious, I try to read as much as I can on this and keep an up to date DB of relevant research pieces.

            I of course disagree that just 33% of russians support putin. Multiple research works show much much higher numbers. But to be honest, I just want to check out the research.

            • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              It’s really hard to find on Google considering this was an academic paper from 3 years ago, but generally the big problem with polling in Russia is that for obvious reasons Russians are scared to give their honest opinions. If asked over the phone what they think of Putin, every politically neutral Russian and even some anti-Putin activists will say they approve.

              From memory, the methodology they used was to give 3 propositions unrelated to Putin (less contentious policy decisions) and the respondents were only asked how many of the statements they agreed with, not which ones. Then they did the same thing again with 4 propositions (4th one being if they approve of Putin), then a 3rd time (this time with the 4th one being if they disapprove). With those 3 datasets, you can then essentially subtract the 3 unrelated propositions from the 4th one they actually cared about, all without requiring the respondent to actually state their opinion on the phone.

              • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Yes, list experiments. There are several research papers with such methodology that I am aware of that cover russian support for the invasion of Ukraine. One shows 65% support for the full scale invasion (even after preference falsification adjustments). Another one regarding annexation of Crimea shows 80% support with no preference falsification (i.e. full alignment with other polling methods); an overwhelming majority of russian really do support the annexation of Crimes; the first stage of their invasion of Ukraine.

                And even logically, the mere existence of preference falsification doesn’t inherently means that it is impossible for a strong majority of russians to be supporters of genocidal imperialism. The preference falsification would be have to be significant (which needs to be shown empirically).

                The 33% support figure conflicts all other research on this topic (using any methodology), that’s why I was asking.

                No worries if you don’t don’t a have link. I might do some random searches using 33% as a base. Cheers!

                • Barbarian@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  I’d be very interested in more recent stuff. As I mentioned, the last time I seriously looked at this was 3 years ago, in the opening stages of the war. It’s very possible that new methods have been developed, people’s opinions have changed over time, or both. If you could possibly throw me some links to more recent papers, I’d greatly appreciate it!

                  • Alphane Moon@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    15 hours ago

                    Haven’t really seen too many new list experiment polling (which is really too bad).

                    There is a good report from Dec 2024 on the topic:

                    The reluctant consensus: War and Russia’s public opinion

                    While the authors use more neutral language (while still being critical), I think it’s reasons to state that this another piece of research that confirms the position that a strong majority of russians are genocidal imperialists.