• snownyte@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    This author needs to go back to a time where you had to manage 512MB of memory.

    People back then would’ve killed for 8GB now.

    The problem I see though is software developers having a field day with not caring about optimizing and not making their software bloated as possible so that it doesn’t require so much memory.

    • ares35@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      the ‘problem’ is: you can’t upgrade; you’re stuck with that 8gb.

      want more in a year or two? you have to buy a new mac. and that’s apple’s goal–sell more product. buyers will be back (because they’re hooked on the platform and ecosystem) to buy a new one sooner than they otherwise would have.

      • snownyte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well that’s what you get for being a tool and buying Apple products.

        All of us PC users have had the convenience of upgrading anything we want. While Apple users just bitch about the choices they’ve made where a company decides how much they think they need and whether or not they can upgrade.

        Wah wah wah.

        • ares35@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          it’s not just apple anymore. all the major ‘pc’ makers have non-upgradeable laptops now… just not across their entire line-up (yet).

    • xep@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes, no big deal. We can go back to having 640x480 displays too.

      • Hule@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        1.2 GB hard drives, too.

        I had to think twice, it didn’t sound right…

        • Billiam@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The first HDD I ever bought was an 80 GB Maxtor. I have games now that wouldn’t even fit on that drive.

          • AWildMimicAppears@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            my first HDD was a whopping 40MB big (you could fit sooo many floppys on that!), weighed 10 pounds and was about the size of a watermelon. when starting wing commander i could determine - by the noises the motors in that thing made - at what point of the loading i was (like an acoustic progress bar lol).

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s a daft take. The reason that software now requires more RAM is because it can do more than in 1998.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Yeah it does because no one in 2024 expects those limitations to exist. You can find software that can run on 15mb of ram but what’s the point when 99% of systems won’t have that limitation?

    • Billiam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      You realize that just because things used to be worse, doesn’t invalidate complaints about how things could be better now, right?

      • snownyte@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I think the comparison went over your head and I didn’t use a word wrong. Try not to think too much into it. Oh wait, you did.