Hemingways_Shotgun

  • 10 Posts
  • 1.55K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 7th, 2023

help-circle


  • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.catoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldT-600
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    “I had to wait until he moved on you to zero him.”

    Okay, hold up. I forgot that line. And I know that this is not the point of the post. But What the Actual Fuck, Reese. You’re telling me that Arnold Shwartzenegar moving like a robot is “hard to spot”.

    You couldn’t make an educated guess and say, “hey…that big motherfucker dressed in all leather with no expression on his face seems to be always around when I’m keeping an eye on this Conner chick.”

    TITL (Today I Tangentially Learned) - Kyle Reese was absolutely dog shit at his ONE JOB.










  • I get zero fulfillment from manually solving merge conflicts, setting up someone’s fragile idea of a config, or other tedious stuff like that

    For sure. And it’s tedious crap like that where A.I can have a limited scope of usefullness. I WANT A.I. to handle all the boring shit so that I can get on with doing the creative side of programming. But CEO’s want it exactly the other way around. Rather than A.I. being your assistant, you become its assistant, it’s proof reader.

    I will happily plug a snippet of code into an AI if it’s not working and I need a second set of eyes on it to see where I missed a goddamned colon. But that’s as far as it ever should go. I don’t want it writing code for me, but it can make a pretty good proof-reader so that I can solve an issue and get on with writing faster.


  • I don’t think this is morally right but this is the wider problem of which overreliance on AI is merely one expression I think

    Oh absolutely. Corporations shoving AI down our throats is a symptom of a much wider problem for sure. It’s just the latest tool in the age old mantra that states that “In order to increase profit, you can either make more or spend less.”

    Somewhere in around the 80’s, corporations realized that labour was their largest expense, and from that point on, employees became just another line item on a spreadsheet. Something to be managed and minimized as much as possible. They try to squeeze that labour metric down as much as possible to achieve more profit without having to increase revenue at the same time, thereby making the stock price rise.

    Humans stopped being an equation in business a long long time ago.


  • Exactly. I think that’s the part that needs to be shouted more.

    Everyone, regardless of their beliefs, bigotry, racism, whatever… just needs to butt the fuck out of everyone elses business.

    Your right to swing your fist ends where someone else’s nose begins.

    I don’t give a shit if a racist refuses to have black person over for dinner at their house or a homophobe refuses to attend a gay wedding of a friend’s son or daughter. What they do in their own home is not my concern. Believe what you want. Make your own family miserable if you want to be that kind of asshole.

    But the moment you step out of the door, you are part of a society. And in that society, whatever you personally believe means precisely jack shit. So mind…your…own…fucking…business. You have a right to your beliefs. But you do NOT have the right to use those beliefs to hinder someone elses.

    Upset that some people are celebrating pride by having a parade? Okay…go home and bitch about it to your wife when you get home, I don’t fucking care. But that’s where your right ends. You have the right to not like it. But you don’t have the right to force everyone else to change to accomodate what you don’t like.


  • 100% I believe the exact same thing. If a person commisions a painting, but the painter is a computer, it doesn’t transfer the title of “artist” onto the person who commisioned the painting.

    They want credit for their “creative work” when really all they are is a middle manager with no actual employees.

    How long do those middle-management chucklefucks think it’ll be before CEO’s realize that they can just ask the computer themselves?




  • Why is it so hard for these idiots to grasp that the process of actually making something yourself IS THE FULFILLING PART.

    It’s not the end result that is where the fulfillment comes in when I’m programming something or writing something; it’s the knowledge that I MADE IT and as a result I have now accomplished something. If you tell an LLM what to do and they do it, you haven’t accomplished anything. You haven’t earned it and you have no right to be proud of it.

    Hell, if an LLM came about that could mow my damn lawn so that I could spend more time writing and programming and 3D modelling and video editing, etc… than hot damn…THAT would be something I would pay for.

    At what point did the adage “It’s not the destination, it’s the journey” cease being meaningful to these morons?


  • Impossible to answer. There’s a lot of different variations of “Favourite”.

    • Favourite comfort show: (ie…rewatchability) Star Trek: TNG. Honourable Mention goes to Quantum Leap.

    • Favourite Drama to rewatch an entire series once a year of so: Battlestar Galactic Remake.

    • Favourite Comedy of all time (similar to comfort show…what’s the comedy I can just pop in a random episode of and enjoy): Night Court (The original one) with honourable mentions to Community and How I Met Your Mother.

    No one of those three beats the other two. They just exist in different worlds.