

My argument addresses voter behavior directly. I’m saying anyone that didn’t vote for Harris is either an idiot or a malicious idiot. I’m not apologizing for voting for Harris. It was easily the right choice. There are no perfect people, so you could argue that voting for anyone would make you an apologist for any of their shortcomings. It’s just strawman arguments. It’s possible to support someone and be critical of them without being an apologist.





I’ve never thought about it, but if I do think about it, it does make me a little uncomfortable. I think it may stem from have the focus brought squarely on me, or when I say someone else’s name, I’m putting them in the spotlight.
It may be similar, but I struggle hard with eye contact. Always have since I was a young child. I can pull it off well enough in professional settings, but otherwise I can’t stare at people’s eyes.