Please actually watch these before jumping to conclusions so you can actually understand what I’m really protesting!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KjAWj_yojm4 Women Who Were Told Their Outfits Were ‘Too Revealing’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jRInrDLw-s Mom Says She Was Kicked Out of Gym For Revealing Tank Top: I Felt Humiliated

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FZRe9CxY38g Cops Dragged Woman Off Beach After Complaint About Her Bikini

It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit or body is “too revealing”,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AG0_OmJcYiw Teens React After Yearbook Photos Are ‘Modesty Edited’

it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look “modest” for a yearbook or a portrait!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYenSnAAmXc 9-Year-Old Saves Family From House Fire

But censoring a topless preteen girl who thought up an ingenious strategy to stay cool like her friends in the same stuffy room while at the same time not caring who’s around her? THAT’S REALLY CROSSING THE LINE!

Many subreddits or forum sites don’t accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! Thereby hindering my ability to fully explain what I’m witnessing!

In this case, the sentences “It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit is ‘too revealing’, it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look ‘modest’ for a yearbook.” actually corresponded to several videos I beared witness to on Inside Edition’s YouTube channel.

I actually tried to post that URL with that blurred 9yo girl in a subreddit in the past and you won’t believe this: I actually lost my reddit account for 2 days for “promoting nudity involving a minor”! Other sites like the adult video forums who accept uncensored nudity-based images I mentioned just delete my thread! Another site I recall banned me for 1 year for “spam” - even though I only made this protest post twice (after they removed it once).

So that meant I had to approach this from a different angle: after that experience, I got a little paranoid from using that said video URL to illustrate. So I tried explaining this protest without the URLs - and this is in conjunction with certain sites restricting my ability to post images, URLs, certain site URLs, or a combination. It seemed to end up making things worse! Because without the visual evidence, it makes it much harder to fully explain what I’m witnessing.

So without the URLs included - that visual illustration, on the sites I tried along with Lemmy World, it actually made things worse! That’s what lead Lemmy World mods to ban me for life for “CSAM” or made other people think I watched child porn when I clearly didn’t. The lack of visual evidence (due to my past reddit experience combined with the site’s posting restrictions) is what lead to this “pedophile” confusion.

I felt after Inside Edition uploaded that blurred 9yo girl video… I thought to myself “That’s the last straw!” Someone needs to protest these absurd censorship laws that they apply to the female human!

Why can males show most of their body but females can’t? - In most cases that is?

Children should have the same… rights to do things as any adult! It’s about possessing the knowledge capacity and I.Q level to safely execute this action. E.G, on those “Family Day” episodes of The Price is Right and Let’s Make a Deal; those kids made smart choices when picking the correct numbers to items to win a prize.

I’m not joking around here! This type of treatment towards the female human needs to stop - this includes race and age. - It’s like racist people, but in age form.

Does it look like I’m laughing for fun? Of course not! Since no one else is protesting this, and YouTube has a flawed comment moderating system hindering my ability to post on even random videos, I have to take more drastic measures to protest by stepping up to the plate and shouting out “Can’t we all be equal in terms of a huge variety of traits?”

We need to learn to appreciate or accept how the female body appears regardless of race and age!

Stop trying to blame it all on me! Remember what Joe King said?

Joe King: None of the stuff in the vids posted, is that. If it was, inside Edition would be the guilty party, and Youtube for not having already deleted them.

If it doesn’t violate Youtube’s TOS, it should be fine to post anywhere. If there was even a hint of impropriety to it, at the minimum the vid would have been age restricted.

I didn’t post any “CSAM”! I’m just trying to protest something I’m seeing that I think is unfair!

But many subreddits or forum sites don’t accept URLs, pictures, specific website URLs, or even a combination! Thereby hindering my ability to fully explain what I’m witnessing!

In this case, the sentences “It’s one thing to say a girl’s outfit is ‘too revealing’, it’s two things to photoshop out a girl’s cleavage to make her look ‘modest’ for a yearbook.” actually corresponded to several videos I beared witness to on Inside Edition’s YouTube channel.